Table 2. Comparison of gene drive-specific characteristics.
| X-Shredder | Killer-Rescue | Medea | Two-locus UD | CRISPR/Cas | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mode of action | Sex ratio/ Chromosomal disruption | Toxin/Antidote | Toxin/Antidote | Toxin/Antidote | Heterozygote to homozygote conversion | |
| Depth of intervention | Class | Suppression | Replacement | Replacement | Replacement | Replacement |
| Range | High | Low | High | Low | High | |
| Invasiveness | Moderate | Low | High | Moderate | Very high | |
| Intensity of intervention | High | High | High | High | Low | |
| Reliability | Resistance formation | Very unlikely | Possible | Possible | Unlikely | Likely |
| Linkage Loss | Unknown | Unknown | Unlikely | Unlikely | Likely | |
| Risk management | Reversibility | None, maybe CRISPR/Cas-based overwriting drive | Wild type release | 2nd generation Medea drive | Wild type release | Overwriting drive |