Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 6.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Eye Res. 2016 Jul 19;158:3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2016.07.011

Table 1:

Outflow facility and TM stiffness (mean ± SD) for C57BL/6J and CBA/J mice*

Mouse
Eye
Strain Freezing
Approach
Age (weeks) Facility nl/(min·mmHg) TM Stiffness
(kPa)
C1M1OS C57BL/6J First
approach
(see text)
12 2.3 ND
C1M2OD 12 3.6 3.68 ± 0.93
C1M2OS 12 3.4 1.21 ± 0.65
C1M3OD 22 8.7 5.32 ± 3.8
C3M1OD 13 4.4 1.36 ± 0.81
C3M1OS 13 8.7 2.41 ± 1.41

Mean ± SD: 5.3 ± 2.9 3.22 ± 1.84

C4M3OD CBA/J Second
approach
(see text)
14 ND 2.91 ± 2.59
C4M3OS 14 4.9 ND
C4M4OD 15 3.9 ND
C4M4OS 15 3.0 1.47 ± 0.71
C4M5OD 15 11.8 0.96 ± 1.01
C4M5OS 15 3.4 6.52 ± 2.87
C5M1OD 11 6.3 1.07 ± 0.36
C5M1OS 11 6.0 0.55 ± 0.22
C5M2OD 11 11.4 12.51± 5.31
C5M2OS 11 3.6 4.12 ± 0.79
C5M3OD 11 7.2 ND
C5M3OS 11 8.9 0.93 ± 0.17
C5M4OD 11 ND 5.2 ± 3.43
C5M4OS 11 3.9 12.25 ± 3.92
C5M5OD 11 17.7 ND

Mean ± SD: 7.4 ± 4.5 3.84 ± 3.37
*

C#M# = Corhort#Mouse#; OD = oculus dextrus; OS = oculus sinister; SD = standard deviation; ND = not determined.