Skip to main content
. 2019 May 5;9(5):e028546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028546

Table 3.

Determinants of sentinel general practices (SGP) reporting of four characteristics of suicide attempts in the Belgian Network of SGP, Flanders, 2013–2016

Baseline characteristics n/N (%) P value Adjusted OR (95% CI)
SGP reported whether suicide risk was noticed (Model 1)
All 120/134 (89.6)
Patient age in years
 <65 99/107 (92.5) 0.025 3.54 (1.11 to 11.26)
 ≥65 21/27 (77.8) Reference
SGP reported whether patient did previous attempts (Model 2)
All 216/235 (91.9)
Patient age in years
 <65 187/209 (89.5) 0.041 Dropped*
 ≥65 36/36 (100.0)
Patient had mental disorder other than depression
 No 189/199 (95.0) 0.000 5.08 (2.11 to 12.21)
 Yes 27/36 (75.0) Reference
Follow-up characteristics
SGP reported whether patient was receiving specialised mental healthcare (Model 3)
All 190/245 (77.6)
Patient age in years
 <65 157/209 (75.1) 0.028 Removed
 ≥65 33/36 (91.7)
GP contact with patient proxies or follow-up appointments scheduled
 No 24/51 (47.1) 0.000 Reference
 Yes 152/189 (80.4) 5.87 (2.76 to 12.51)
Hospital care information received by GP
 No 43/64 (67.2) 0.012 Reference
 Yes 112/135 (83.0) 2.38 (1.12 to 5.02)
SGP reported whether patient repeated suicidal behaviour (Model 4)
All 190/245 (77.6)
Patient sex
 Men 61/88 (69.3) 0.021 Reference
2.11 (1.10 to 4.03)
 Women 129/157 (82.2)
GP–patient contact in month preceding attempt
 No 79/111 (71.2) 0.029 Removed
 Yes 111/134 (82.8)
GP contact with patient, patient proxies or follow-up appointments scheduled
 No 3/13 (23.1) 0.000 Reference
14.1 (3.67 to 54.42)
 Yes 187/231 (81.0)

The first two models examining determinants of baseline characteristics initially included independent baseline variables associated univariately at the (borderline) 0.05 level with the dependent variable. The two last models examining determinants of follow-up characteristics initially included all independent variables associated univariately at the (borderline) 0.05 level with the dependent variable.

*Patient age was dropped because age≥ 65 predicted the outcome perfectly.

†Variable was removed because it did not significantly affect the fit of the model.

CI, confidence interval; GP, general practitioner; OR, odds ratio; P, p value of univariate association.