Skip to main content
. 2018;89(3):415–422. doi: 10.23750/abm.v89i3.5655

Table 1.

Reported results of scapular reconstructions (prosthesis and allograft) in comparison to the current study

Author Patients Reconstruction Follow-up Complications Functional score
Witting (18) 3 Constrained prosthesis 16 months None ISOLS 80%-90%
Schwab (16) 19 Constrained-noncostrained prosthesis 18 months 2 infections 2 dislocations 2 wound necrosis ISOLS 82%
Pritsch (15) 15 Constrained-noncostrained prosthesis 90 months 2 wound dehiscences 1 dislocation ISOLS 79%
Masamed (9) 13 Constrained prosthesis Not available 3 dislocations 3 wound seromas Not available
Baran (1) 7 1 Fibular autograft 6 Constrained-non costrained prosthesis 35 months 1 shoulder instability MSTS 73.3%
Tang (17) 10 Constrained prosthesis 36 months 1 dislocation 1 wound infection ISOLS 76.6%
Lee (6) 2 2 Glenoid allograft 33 months None ISOLS 90%
Mnaymneh (13) 6 5 Total scapula allograft 1 glenoid allograft 1 allograft fracture 44 months ISOLS 82%
Zhang (19) 3 3 glenoid allograft 26 months 1 chronic pain ISOLS 79%
Chandrasekar (3) 2 2 irradiated scapula autograft 36 months None Not available
Merriman (12) 1 1 total scapula allograft 61 months None Not available
Capanna (2) 6 5 total scapula allograft 1 irradiated scapula autograft 66 months 2 osteosynthesis failures 1 allograft fracture ISOLS 66.7%
Current study 3 1 total scapula allograft 1 glenoid prosthesis 1 coracoid allograft 60 months 1 intraoperative scapula fracture and proximal humerus arthtritis MSTS 73%