Abstract
Background
Cerebral oxygen desaturation can arise during various durations of cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP), thus continuous monitoring is necessary. This desaturation may account for distinct neuropsychological deficits. Near-infrared spectrophotometry (NIRS) is a non-invasive method that offers many advantages for monitoring cerebral oxygenation.
Objectives
The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of propofol and dexmedetomidine on cerebral regional oxygen saturation (rScO2) during CPB and on postoperative cognitive dysfunction.
Patients and Methods
50 patients anticipated for open heart surgeries were encompassed in the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups, group P (receiving propofol) and group D (receiving dexmedetomidine) during CPB. Both groups were studied for variations in right and left rScO2 as well as postoperative cognitive dysfunction using the Mini Mental State Examination Score (MMSE) test.
Results
The results showed no significant difference in both groups of the study, with an increase in rScO2 on the right and left side in T1 compared to T0 and maximum increase in T3–4–5, then a decrease in T6–7. With regard to the cognitive dysfunction there was a decrease in the values at 1 h in both groups without significant difference; after 1 week MMSE values returned to baseline values.
Conclusion
Propofol and dexmedetomidine infusion used during CPB preserve the rScO2 and do not affect the neurological outcome.
Keywords: cerebral oxygen saturation, cardiopulmonary bypass, dexmedetomidine, propofol
Introduction
Neuropsychological and neurological deficits are still the most considerable reasons of morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery [1]. These complications are thought to be provoked by embolisms and cerebral hypoxia [2]. Cerebral oxygen desaturation can take place during different periods of cardiac surgery; thus continuous monitoring is fundamental [3]. (NIRS) is a non-invasive method that shows many advantages for monitoring cerebral oxygenation [4].
Maintaining (rScO2) higher than 50% has been found to reduce postoperative neurological dysfunction and accomplish with improved clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery [5]. Cerebral oxygen desaturation can happen at the initiation of CBP because of hemodilution or during the low perfusion and rewarming stages [6].
Propofol is a sterically hindered phenol (2,6 diisopropylphenol) that was introduced in 1989. It has a very short half-life with a short postoperative recovery period [7]. Propofol produces a dose-dependent decline in the cerebral blood flow (CBF) and the cerebral metabolic rate (CMR).
Dexmedetomidine is an imidazole-derivative adrenoceptor agonist presenting high selectivity for α2 adrenergic agonist [8]. It has a sedative, analgesic and induces suppression of central sympathetic outflow [9]. It selectively stimulates presynaptic α2 receptors with dose dependent reduction in arterial pressure, heart rate, cardiac output and norepinephrine release [10]. Dexmedetomidine decrease the CBF without change in CMR, which may influence the cerebral oxygen delivery.
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of propofol and dexmedetomidine infusion on rScO2 during different stages of CPB and its influence on postoperative cognitive dysfunction.
Patients and Methods
This prospective, randomized, double blind study was conducted between June 2016 and May 2017 after obtaining the approval of the Ethical Committee Board. A written informed consent was taken from patients scheduled for open heart surgery over 1 year, either valve surgeries or pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgeries, either males or females. After exclusion of emergency cases, patients with cervical spine pathology (cervical stenosis, cervical disc herniation, carotid stenosis), patients with cerebral pathology (cerebral strokes, ischemic attacks), patients with Mini Mental State Examination Score (MMSE) of 23 or less, complicated cases with prolongation of the cardiopulmonary bypass period, patients needing moderate hypothermia, 50 patients remained and were included in the study.
Based on a computer-generated randomization list, patients were divided into 2 groups (group P and group D) of 25 patients each, group P patients receiving propofol infusion, group D patients receiving dexmedetomidine infusion.
The anaesthetic technique was standardized to all patients. On arrival to the operating room patients were connected to the monitor (Aisys; Datex-Ohmeda, Inc., a General Electric Company, doing business as GE Healthcare, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), 5 leads electrocardiogram (ECG), oxygen saturation (SPO2), noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP). Regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO2) was continuously monitored using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) with an INVOS® 5100C cerebral oximeter (Somanetics, Troy, MI). After cleansing the skin area with alcohol, sensors for cerebral oximeter were placed bilaterally on the right and left sides of the forehead according to the manufacturer’s instructions with the caudal border about 1 cm above the eyebrow with the medial edge at the midline. This position takes the light source and sensors away from the frontal sinus and temporalis muscle. The rScO2 values from the right and left frontal lobes were averaged to determine cerebral oxygenation, and a baseline of rScO2 was recorded. Electrodes for the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) (Maquet, Sweden) were placed. Temperature was controlled through a heating cooling unit (Stockert-T3, Germany) and measured continuously through oropharyngeal and rectal probes.
Patients received 0.02 mg.kg−1 midazolam i.v. (Midazolam Labesfal, 15 mg/3 ml) through a peripheral cannula 20 G that was inserted in the station before arriving at the operating room. Radial arterial cannula, either right or left was inserted under aseptic technique after injecting lidocaine 1 mg.kg−1 as local anaesthesia and connected to a pressure transducer (GE Healthcare, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) for continuous monitoring of invasive blood pressure. The pressure transducer was referenced to the mid-axillary level, and a base line arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) was recorded. Ultrasound guided (portable Sonosite, linear probe 10-5 MHz, Fujifilm, Sonosite, inc, USA) right Internal Jugular central venous catheter was inserted under complete aseptic technique, a baseline venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) was taken.
After pre-oxygenation for 3 min, anesthesia was induced by fentanyl 5–10 mcg.kg-1 (50 μg/ml, 2 ml) and cisatracurium 0.15 mg.kg-1 (10 ml, 2 mg/ml). 3 min later patients were intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube, the cuff pressure maintained at 20 cm H2O, the position of the endotracheal tube was checked by chest auscultation and end-tidal CO2 once the patient was connected to the anaesthesia machine. The lungs were mechanically ventilated with 100% oxygen which was minimized gradually according to the arterial blood gases (ABG) to 60% oxygen in air. Anaesthesia was maintained by 0.5–1% end-tidal sevoflurane in 60% oxygen in air flow, cisatracurium infusion at a rate 0.1 mg.kg.h−1 (2 ampoules 40 mg/20 ml, diluted in 50 ml syringe, with aconcentration of 0.8 mg/ml), fentanyl infusion at a rate of 1–3 mcg.kg.h−1 (500 mcg/10 ml ampoule, diluted in 40 ml normal saline 0.9%, concentration 10 μg/ml) and lactated ringer solution at a rate of 8–10 ml.kg.h−1. Routine continuous monitoring in the form of invasive blood pressure, heart rate, SPO2, end-tidal CO2, oro-pharyngeal and rectal temperature, rScO2, urine output, sevoflurane, air and oxygen were measured with gas analyzer, arterial blood gases and venous blood gases were recorded on demand.
Once patients were connected to the heart-lung machine, sevoflurane was discontinued and the patient disconnected from the anaesthesia machine. Propofol infusion at a rate of 0.3–4 mg.kg.h−1 (500 mg in 50 ml syringe) started and dexmedetomidine infusion at a rate of 0.2–0.7 mcg.kg.h−1 (200 mcg dexmedetomidine diluted in 48 ml of 0.9% normal saline injection for a final concentration of 4 mcg/ml) together with fentanyl infusion at a rate of 1–3 mcg.kg.h−1. The rScO2 was recorded before induction of anaesthesia T0 then 10 min after inductionT1 then 5 min after starting cardiopulmonary bypass T2, then 5 min after reaching the desired temperature T3, then every 30 min T4, and T5 of CPB, then 5 min after reaching the desired temperature T6, then 5 min after weaning of the cardiopulmonary bypass T7.
During the cardiopulmonary bypass period, the flow was kept between 2.2–2.6 L/m2 to maintain a MBP between 60–70 mmHg, the temperature kept at 34°C during cooling, the PaCO2 between 36–42 cmH2O, the PH above 7.36, and the hematocrit around 30. Any changes in these parameters were managed by the perfusionist.
Baseline rScO2 was defined as the average saturation value over a 1-min period before induction of general anaesthesia. Cerebral desaturation was defined as a reduction of rScO2 more than 20% of baseline for more than 15 s, which should be treated by the attending perfusionist and anaesthesiologist by adjusting the perfusion pressure to keep a mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) between 60–70 mmHg through the manipulation of the infused drugs or giving vasopressors as phenylephrine 100–200 mcg, and increasing FiO2. Once patients weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass propofol and dexmedetomidine infusion were discontinued, patients reconnected to the anaesthesia machine, with 0.5–1% sevoflurane in 100% oxygen flow, re-expansion of the lungs manually, and then anaesthesia was maintained till closure of skin.
Once the patients were extubated in cardiac surgical unit (CSU), they were neurologically assessed by the intensivist for gross motor and sensory neurologic evaluation and gross cognitive evaluation (orientation in time and space, recall of name, date of birth, and address). Any side effects were recorded.
Cognitive function of the patients was assessed using the MMSE test the day before surgery and then reassessed 1 hour after extubation then 1 week after the operation. The mini-mental state examination (MMSE) or Folstein test is a brief 30-point questionnaire test that is used to screen for cognitive impairment. The MMSE test includes simple questions and problems in a number of areas: the time and place of the test, repeating lists of words, arithmetic, language use and comprehension, and basic motor skills. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) was considered when there was decrease in MMSE score 2 points or more from preoperative value (Table 1).
Table 1.
Mini-mental state examination
| Category | Possible points | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Orientation to time | 5 | From broadest to most narrow. Orientation to time has been correlated with future decline |
| Orientation to place | 5 | From broadest to most narrow. This is sometimes narrowed down to streets and sometimes to floor |
| Registration | 3 | Repeating named prompts |
| Attention and calculation | 5 | Serial sevens or spelling “world” backwards. It has been suggested that serial sevens may be more appropriate in a population where English is not the first language |
| Recall | 3 | Registration recall |
| Language | 2 | Naming a pencil and a watch |
| Repetition | 1 | Speaking back a phrase |
| Complex commands | 6 | Varies. Can involve drawing figure shown |
Patients were studied for rScO2 as primary outcome and MMSE as secondary outcome
Statistical analysis
Using PASS for sample size calculation, it was calculated that a sample size of 25 patients per group would achieves 82% power to detect a mean of paired differences in the regional cerebral oxygen of 20.0 with an estimated standard deviation of differences of 20.0 and with a significance level (alpha) of 0.05.
The statistical analysis was executed using a standard SPSS software package version 20 (IBM, Armonk, NY, United States of America). Data were expressed as mean values ± SD, numbers (%), Student’s t-test was used to analyze the parametric data, and categorical variables were analyzed using the χ2 test, with p values < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results
With regard to the demographic data there was no significant difference between the 2 groups of the study regarding age, sex, type of surgery (Table 2).
Table 2.
Demographic data in both groups
| Group P (n = 25) | Group D (n = 25) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 60.32 ± 7.004 | 60.52 ± 5.96 | 0.94 |
|
| |||
| Sex (M/F) | 14/11 | 16/9 | 0.77 |
|
| |||
| Type of surgery | |||
| • Valve surgery | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| • Coronary artery bypass grafting | 21 | 22 | |
Data were expressed as mean ± SD or number of patients
P-value > 0.05 is considered statistically non-significant
As regards the right rScO2 (Table 3, Figure 1) there was no significant difference between both groups at T0 (71.44 ± 3.7) in group P compared to (71.72 ± 3.59) in group D. There was an increase in rScO2 in both groups at T1 with no significant difference, (72.4 ± 3.6) in group P and (72.7 ± 3.6) in group D. There was an increase in rScO2 in both groups at T2 with no significant difference (73.44 ± 3.7) in group P and (73.64 ± 3.63) in group D. At T3, T4, and T5 there was a maximum increase in rScO2 in both groups with no significant difference, at T3 (77 ± 3.37) in group P and (78.1 ± 4) in group D, at T4 (76.88 ± 3.4) in group P and (78 ± 3.7) in group D, and at T5 (76.84 ± 3.4) in group P and (77.96 ± 3.7) in group D. There was a decrease of the rScO2 in both groups at T6 then at T7 without significant difference; at T6 (73.44 ± 3.66) in group P and (73.6 ± 3.62) in group D, and (72.2 ± 3.8) in group P and (72.8 ± 3.7) in group D at T7.
Table 3.
Changes of right regional cerebral tissue oxygen saturation in both the P group (propofol) and D group (dexmedetomidine)
| Time intervals | Group P (n = 25) | Group D (n = 25) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 71.44 ± 3.7 | 71.72 ± 3.59 | 0.786 |
| T1 | 72.4 ± 3.6 | 72.7 ± 3.6 | 0.78 |
| T2 | 73.44 ± 3.7 | 73.64 ± 3.63 | 0.847 |
| T3 | 77 ± 3.37 | 78.1 ± 4 | 0.269 |
| T4 | 76.88 ± 3.4 | 78 ± 3.7 | 0.271 |
| T5 | 76.84 ± 3.4 | 77.96 ± 3.7 | 0.273 |
| T6 | 73.44 ± 3.66 | 73.6 ± 3.62 | 0.872 |
| T7 | 72.2 ± 3.8 | 72.8 ± 3.7 | 0.574 |
Data were expressed as mean ± SD
P-value > 0.05 is considered statistically non-significant
Fig. 1.
Changes of right regional cerebral tissue oxygen saturation
As regards the left rScO2 (Table 4, Figure 2) there was no significant difference between both groups at T0 (71.72 ± 3.58) in group P compared to (71.48 ± 3.71) in group D. There was increase in rScO2 in both groups at T1 with no significant difference, (72.7 ± 3.6) in group P and (72.5 ± 3.7) in group D. There was increase in rScO2 in both groups at T2 with no significant difference, (73.64 ± 3.63) in group P and (73.5 ± 3.68) in group D. At T3, T4, and T5 there was a maximum increase in rScO2 in both groups with no significant difference, at T3 (78.12 ± 3.37) in group P and (77.1 ± 3.43) in group D, at T4 (78 ± 3.7) in group P and (77 ± 3.38) in group D, and at T5 (77.96 ± 3.74) in group P and (76.9 ± 3.44) in group D. There was a decrease of the rScO2 in both groups at T6 then at T7 without significant difference; at T6 (73.6 ± 3.6) in group P and (73.5 ± 3.7) in group D, and (72.8 ± 3.7) in group P and (72.1 ± 3.86) in group D at T7.
Table 4.
Changes of left regional cerebral tissue oxygen saturation in both P groups (propofol) and D group (dexmedetomidine)
| Time intervals | Group P (n = 25) | Group D (n = 25) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 71.72 ± 3.58 | 71.48 ± 3.71 | 0.817 |
| T1 | 72.7 ± 3.6 | 72.5 ± 3.7 | 0.846 |
| T2 | 73.64 ± 3.63 | 73.5 ± 3.68 | 0.91 |
| T3 | 78.12 ± 3.37 | 77.1 ± 3.43 | 0.31 |
| T4 | 78 ± 3.7 | 77 ± 3.38 | 0.33 |
| T5 | 77.96 ± 3.74 | 76.9 ± 3.44 | 0.311 |
| T6 | 73.6 ± 3.6 | 73.5 ± 3.7 | 0.91 |
| T7 | 72.8 ± 3.7 | 72.1 ± 3.86 | 0.53 |
Data were expressed as mean ± SD
P-value > 0.05 is considered statistically non-significant
Fig. 2.
Changes of left regional cerebral tissue oxygen saturation
As regards the MMSE (Table 5) there was no significant difference between both groups at the preoperative value (30) in group P and (30) in group D. As regard MMSE at 1 h there was a decrease in the values compared to the baseline with no significant difference in both groups (23.3 ± 0.408) in group P and (23.2 ± 0.41) in group D. After 1 week the MMSE returned back to baseline value with no significant difference between both groups (30) in group P and (30) in group D.
Table 5.
Changes of mini-mental state examination in both the P group (propofol) and D group (dexmedetomidine)
| Group P (n = 25) | Group D (n = 25) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMSE preoperative | 30 | 30 | 1 |
| MMSE 1 h | 23.3 ± 0.408 | 23.2 ± 0.41 | 1 |
| MMSE 1 week | 30 | 30 | 1 |
Data were expressed as mean ± SD or number of patients
P-value > 0.05 is considered statistically non-significant
Discussion
This prospective randomized double-blind study was designed to compare the effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine infusion during CPB on rScO2. The success of cardiac surgery is related to the neurological outcome of the patients, which can be adversely affected by cerebral oxygen desaturation [11]. During CPB, cerebral oxygen desaturation occurs at different time, such as the beginning of bypass due to hemodilution, during low perfusion and during rewarming. Correcting the cause of desaturation is an important issue in anaesthetic management, and preserving rScO2 is a major concern in cardiac surgery [6].
In our current study the factors influencing the rScO2 were kept constant throughout the procedure. In the literature, 20% decrease in the baseline value of rScO2 has been suggested as the best threshold value to predict cerebral ischemia. However, performed studies have shown that rScO2 values decreasing below 50 even for a short period of time, resulted in significant cognitive or neurological damage [12].
In our current study no rScO2 value as cerebral desaturation was detected in both groups during the procedure. Propofol leads to an increase in cerebrovascular resistance while it decreases cerebral blood flow and cerebral metabolic rate [13]. It has been demonstrated that dexmedetomidine in a dose dependent manner, leads to a decrease in the cerebral blood flow [14]. Studies concerning the effect of both drugs on rScO2 have conflicting results in the literature.
In the current study and after induction of anaesthesia there was an increase in the rScO2 in both groups compared to the baseline with no significant value. 5 min after starting the CPB there was a non-significant increase in the rScO2 in both groups although it is well known from other studies that hemodilution at the start of CPB causes a decline in rScO2 which may be due to the constant hematocrit which is kept at 30% throughout the procedure.
Once cooling started, the cerebral metabolic rate and oxygen consumption decreased. Thus saturation can decrease during the initial part of CPB as well as during the rewarming stage, which correlates to the current study showing a non-significant increase in rScO2 in both groups of the study and then it decreased again during the period of rewarming and after CPB [15].
Regarding both groups of the study, there was no significant difference between them throughout the procedure, regardless the variation of rScO2 which was mainly due to the effect of hemodilution, temperature, PaCO2, and PH.
Michenfender [16] showed that following the administration of propofol, the relationship between cerebral flow and metabolism was preserved, and rScO2 remained unchanged. Le Blanc et al., in the study on children with cardiac surgical operations, showed that propofol did not interfere with cerebral oxygenation and metabolism in which it was suggested that it was due to the effect of propofol on the stabilization of energy balance in mitochondrial level [17]. Drummond measured cerebral tissue oxygenation during the administration of dexmedetomidine for neurovascular surgery and determined that dexmedetomidine disturb neither cerebral oxygenation nor cerebral metabolism [18]. Rooyen et al. found that dexmedetomidine decreased cerebral tissue oxygenation, but they reported that this situation was clinically non-significant [19]. Padmanabhan et al. assessed cerebral oxygenation levels in children during the sedation process out of the operation room, and did not recognize any decrease in cerebral oxygenation in children with both medications [20].
The minimal difference in oxygen saturation between the right and left sides was correlating with the study of Güçlü et al., and skin hair follicles, forehead shape and arterio-venous anatomy might have been responsible for the difference [6].
The MMSE was used for evaluating cognitive function as it has many advantages regarding its high validity and reliability, ease of use and suitability for bedside use. Also MMSE is very appropriate for repeated cognitive assessments overtime [21]. There are other sensitive and specific scores as regards the assessment of cognitive functions. However, they have major drawbacks of lengthy, complex administration guidelines and duration in its application [22].
In the current study there was no significant difference in MMSE between both groups of the study. MMSE was lower at 1 h postoperative in comparison to baseline value which might be due to the effect of CPB and sedation, and it reaches the baseline value after 1week. Maghawry et al., who studied the effect of dexmedetomidine and esmolol on rScO2 during hypotensive anaesthesia in shoulder arthroscopy, found that there was no significant difference in both groups within group comparison or in between group comparison [23]. Townes and colleagues reported there were no neuropsychological changes or decrease in the MMSE score after induced hypotension in healthy young adults [24]. Güçlü et al., who compared the effect of sevofurane and fentanyl-midazolam combination on rScO2 during open heart surgery, found that there was a superiority of the sevoflurane group but they have several limitations in their study, as they did not use any neurocognitive or neuropsychiatric tests after surgery to identify neurological outcomes [6].
Proper intraoperative management and prevention of any cerebral oxygen desaturation could explain the absence of any significant difference between the preoperative and the postoperative MMSE values.
Conclusion
Monitoring the rScO2 during open heart surgery is an important tool to identify any cerebral desaturation during CPB. Its variation throughout the procedure was not related to propofol or dexmedetomidine infusion, but it is mainly related to the variation in hematocrit, PH, PaCO2 and temperature variation. Propofol and dexmedetomidine infusion used during CPB preserve the rScO2 and does not affect the neurological outcome.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest
Nothing to declare
References
- 1.Shroyer AL, Coombs LP, Peterson ED, Eiken MC, DeLong ER, Chen A, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons: 30-day operative mortality and morbidity risk models. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:1856–1864. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)00179-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Uehara T, Tabuchi M, Kozawa S, Mori E. MR angiographic evaluation of carotid and intracranial arteries in Japanese patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001;11:341–345. doi: 10.1159/000047664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Edmonds HL, Jr, Ganzel BL, Austin EH., 3rd Cerebral oximetry for cardiac and vascular surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;8:147–166. doi: 10.1177/108925320400800208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Murkin JM, Arango M. Near-infrared spectroscopy as an index of brain and tissue oxygenation. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(Suppl 1):i3–i13. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Murkin JM, Adams SJ, Novick RJ, Quantz M, Bainbridge D, Iglesias I, et al. Monitoring brain oxygen saturation during coronary bypass surgery: a randomized, prospective study. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:51–58. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000246814.29362.f4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Güçlü ÇY, Ünver S, Aydinli B, Kazanci D, Dilber E, Özgök A. The effect of sevoflurane vs. TIVA on cerebral oxygen saturation during cardiopulmonary bypass – randomized trial. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2014;23:919–924. doi: 10.17219/acem/37339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Smith I, White PF, Nathanson M, Gouldson R. Propofol. An update on its clinical use. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:1005–1043. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Virtanen R, Savola JM, Saano V, Nyman L. Characterization of the selectivity, specificity and potency of medetomidine as an α2-adrenoceptor agonist. Eur J Pharmacol. 1988;150:9–14. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(88)90744-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lakhlani PP, MacMillan LB, Guo TZ, McCool BA, Lovinger DM, Maze M, et al. Substitution of a mutant α2a-adrenergic receptor via “hit and run” gene targeting reveals the role of this subtype in sedative, analgesic, and anesthetic-sparing responses in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:9950–9955. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chrysostomou C, Schmitt CG. Dexmedetomidine: sedation, analgesia and beyond. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2008;4:619–627. doi: 10.1517/17425255.4.5.619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Goldman S, Sutter F, Ferdinand F, Trace C. Optimizing intraoperative cerebral oxygen delivery using noninvasive cerebral oximetry decreases the incidence of stroke for cardiac surgical patients. Heart Surg Forum. 2004;7:E376–381. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20041062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yao FS, Tseng CC, Ho CY, Levin SK, Illner P. Cerbral oxygen desaturation is associated with early postoperative neuropsychological dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18:552–558. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Usher AG, Kearney RA, Tsui BC. Propofol total intravenous anesthesia for MRI in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005;15:23–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01390.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cetin M, Birbicer H, Hallioglu O, Orekeci G. Comparative study between the effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol on cerebral oxygenation during sedation at pediatric cardiac catheterization. Ann Card Anaesth. 2016;19:20–24. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.173015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Teng Y, Ding H, Gong Q, Jia Z, Huang L. Monitoring cerebral oxygen saturation during cardiopulmonary bypass using near-infrared spectroscopy: the relationships with body temperature and perfusion rate. J Biomed Opt. 2006;11 doi: 10.1117/1.2187422. 024016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Michenfender JD. Anesthesia and the Brain: clinical, functional, metabolic, and vascular correlates. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1988. pp. 21–29. [Google Scholar]
- 17.LeBlanc JG, Blackstock D, Macnab AJ, Gagnon F, Gagnon R, Russell J, et al. Effects of propofol on cerebral oxygenation during cardiopulmonary bypass in children. Can J Anaesth. 2000;47:1082–1089. doi: 10.1007/BF03027959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Drummond JC, Sturaitis MK. Brain tissue oxygenation during dexmedetomidine administration in surgical patients with neurovascular injuries. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2010;22:336–341. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181e4b7e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Everett LL, van Rooyen IF, Warner MH, Shurtleff HA, Saneto RP, Ojemann JG. Use of dexmedetomidine in awake craniotomy in adolescents: report of two cases. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006;16:338–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01697.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Padmanabhan P, Berkenbosch JW, Lorenz D, Pierce MC. Evaluation of cerebral oxygenation during procedural sedation in children using near infrared spectroscopy. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54:205–213. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Casati A, Aldegheri G, Vinciguerra E, Marsan A, Fraschini G, Torri G. Randomized comparison between sevoflurane anaesthesia and unilateral spinal anaesthesia in elderly patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003;20:640–646. doi: 10.1017/S0265021503001030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.te Winkel-Witlox ACM, Post MW, Visser-Melly JMA, Lindeman E. Efficient screening of cognitive dysfunction in stroke patients: Comparison between the CAMCOG and the R-CAMCOG, Mini Mental State Examination and Functional Independence Measure-cognition score. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:1386–1391. doi: 10.1080/09638280701623000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Maghawry KM, El-Agamy A, Tahir WI, Zein AF. Cerebral oxygen saturation monitoring during hypotensive anesthesia in shoulder arthroscopy: A comparative study between dexmedetomidine and esmolol. Egypt J Anaesth. 2015;31:43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.egja.2014.09.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Townes BD, Dikmen SS, Bledsoe SW, Hornbein TF, Martin DC, Janesheski JA. Neuropsychological changes in a young, healthy population after controlled hypotensive anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1986;65:955–959. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


