Table 3. The five-class solution for the DC profiles with three measurement times (N = 108) (Latent Profile Analyses). ANOVA.
| DC patterns | n (%) | Concern | Detachment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 M (SE) |
T2 M (SE) |
T3 M (SE) |
T1 M (SE) |
T2 M (SE) |
T3 M (SE) |
||
| 1. Low concern, high detachment (Detached) | 35 (33) | 3.59 (0.05) | 3.62 (0.06) | 3.58 (0.06) | 4.13 (0.06) | 4.09 (0.05) | 4.10 (0.08) |
| 2. High concern, moderate detachment (Empathic) | 33 (31) | 4.22 (0.08) | 4.26 (0.06) | 4.19 (0.07) | 3.52 (0.07) | 3.55 (0.07) | 3.67 (0.08) |
| 3. High concern, high detachment (Balanced) | 23 (21) | 4.34 (0.08) | 4.43 (0.08) | 4.47 (0.06) | 4.44 (0.08) | 4.58 (0.07) | 4.44 (0.10) |
| 4. High concern, low detachment (curvilinear trend) (Boundless) | 9 (8) | 4.33 (0.13) | 4.24 (0.13) | 3.96 (0.17) | 2.82 (0.16) | 2.44 (0.10) | 2.91 (0.25) |
| 5. Low concern, moderate detachment (increasing) (Moderately uninvolved) | 8 (7) | 3.13 (0.16) | 3.17 (0.08) | 3.29 (0.17) | 2.90 (0.16) | 3.44 (0.12) | 3.53 (0.16) |
| F-test | 26.70*** | 34.48*** | 27.57*** | 48.07*** | 80.09*** | 20.24*** | |
| Pairwise comparisons1 | 1 < 2,3,4 5 < 1,2,3,4 |
1 < 2,3,4 5 < 1,2,3,4 |
1 < 2,3 3 > 4 5 < 2,3,4 |
1 > 2,4,5 2 > 4,5 3 > 1,2,4,5 |
1 > 2,4,5 2 > 4 3 > 1,2,4,5 4 < 5 |
1 > 2,4,5 2 > 4 3 > 2,4,5 |
|
Note
***p<0.001
1Significant Bonferroni comparisons.