Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 6.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychologia. 2016 Mar 26;85:278–286. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.03.018

Table 1.

Subject characteristics between Pet Owner (PO) and Non-Pet Owner (NPO) groups.

NPO (N = 15) PO (N = 15) Chi Square, Mann-
Whitney U, or t-test
Age (Mean ± S.D.) 36.1 ± 17.6 32.4 ± 13.9 t(28) = 0.65, p > 0.250
Race (n) X2=93, p=0.025
 Asian or Pacific Islander 7 2
 African American 1 0
 Hispanic 2 0
 Native American 0 0
 Caucasian 5 13
Highest Level of Education (n) X2=1.5, p > 0.250
 Less than high school 0 0
 High school/GED 0 1
 Attended college 5 5
 2-year college degree 2 3
 4-year college degree 3 2
 Post-graduate degree 5 4
Marital Status (n) X2=1.1, p > 0.250
 Single 11 11
 Married 3 4
 Separated/Divorced 1 0
 Widowed 0 0
Household Income (n) X2=3.7, p > 0.250
 Less than $25,000 2 4
 $25,000–$49,999 6 2
 $50,000–$99,000 2 3
 $100,000 + 3 5
 Unwilling to disclose 2 1
Close emotional bonds (n) X2=4.9, p > 0.250
 0–4 7 5
 5–9 6 7
 10+ 2 3
Attraction to animal species, median ratinga
 Bird 5 3 72
 Cat 3 7 55.5*
 Dog 7 9 24***
 Fish 4 3 100.5
 Small mammal 3 4 94.5
 Reptile/amphibian 2 3 79.5
 Mean ± S.E. 4.2 ± 0.3 5.3 ± 0.3 t(28) = 2.20, p = 0.037*
a

Median rating for “general attraction” to animal species; 1 = no attraction; 10 = strong attraction.

*

p < 0.05, significant difference between the two groups.

***

p < 0.001, significant difference between the two groups.