Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun;5(2):103–107. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.5-2-103

Table 1.

Financial and environmental values for three haemodialysis modalities and their cost-effectiveness

ICHD HHD HNHD
Regime (per week) 3×4 hours 3×4 hours 6×7 hours
Year Year 1 Year 2 Year 1 Year 2 Year 1 Year 2
Carbon footprint (ton CO2eq, in 2010)a 4.77b 3.82 4.14b 3.31 9.00b 7.20
Cost of carbon (£, in 2010)c 248.17 198.54 215.02 172.02 467.81 374.24
Cost of treatment (£, 2010)d 28,131.88 27,921.08 27,921.08 23,412.44 35,896.76 30,654.04
Quality-adjusted life years (QALY)e 0.84 1.23 1.08 1.64 1.41 1.42
Total cost (£, in 2010)f 28,380.05 28,119.62 28,136.10 23,584.46 36,364.57 31,028.28
Cost per QALY (£, in 2010) 33,490.33 22,861.48 25,852.85 14,380.77 25,458.70 21,850.90
ICERg   –£1,016.46 –£11,061.37 £14,007.92 £15,308.78

aConnor et al (2010)18

bFirst year initiation emissions were not available. A 25% uplift is added to yearly emission rates in the first year to account for this.

cnon-traded carbon price of £52 per ton CO2eq, DECC (2009)20

dKomenda et al (2012)19

eQALYs for ICHD and HHD from Beby et al (2016)21. QALYs for HNHD from Klarenbach et al (2014)22

fTotal cost is the sum of the cost of carbon and the financial cost of treatment

gwith reference to ICHD

HHD = haemodialysis; HNHD = home nocturnal haemodialysis; ICHD = in-centre haemodialysis; QALY = quality-adjusted life years