. 2018 Sep 13;32(5):711–720. doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0408

Table 8.

Effects of potassium humate and enzyme dietary inclusions on fatty acid composition (%) of breast muscle from broiler fed canola-based diets

Fatty acids	Dietary treatments¹⁾					SEM

	Control	CM	CMEnz	CMPh	CMEnzPh
Myristic (C14:0)	0.37^a	0.29^b	0.27^c	0.29^b	0.29^b	0.01
Myristoleic (C14:1c9)	0.07^a	0.03^b	0.02^b	0.00^b	0.01^b	0.01
Pentadecylic (C15:0)	0.08	0.08	0.07	0.09	0.08	0.01
Palmitic (C16:0)	23.86^a	21.08^c	21.18^bc	22.07^b	21.86^bc	0.24
Palmitoleic (C16:1)	4.65^a	2.58^b	2.35^b	1.80^c	2.46^b	0.24
Margaric (C17:0)	0.94	0.96	1.05	1.29	0.93	0.09
Heptadecenoic (C17:1)	0.06	0.14	0.19	0.09	0.14	0.07
Stearic acid (C18:0)	8.01^c	8.09^c	9.07^b	9.84^a	8.39^b	0.42
Oleic (C18:1)	30.43^a	26.72^b	26.28^b	25.36^c	26.67^b	0.77
Vaccenic (C18:1, 7)	4.54^a	4.39^b	4.39^b	4.07^c	4.27^b	0.09
Nonoadecanoic (C19:0)	0.47	0.48	0.53	0.66	0.46	0.05
Linoleic (C18:2, n-6)	19.33^c	25.54^a	24.27^a	22.98^b	24.96^a	0.65
Arachidic (C20:0)	0.04	0.05	0.04	0.04	0.03	0.01
α-Linolenic (C18:3 n-3)	1.02^d	1.96^a	1.76^b	1.62^c	1.79^b	0.09
Heneicosanoic (C21:0)	0.24	0.25	0.27	0.33	0.23	0.03
Eicosadienoic (C20:2, n-6)	0.36^c	0.67^a	0.59^b	0.67^a	0.57^b	0.57
Eicosatrienoic (C20:3 n-6)	0.03^c	0.10^a	0.09^b	0.11^a	0.07^b	0.01
Erucic (C22:1)	0.83	0.76	0.75	0.84	0.70	0.07
Arachidonic (C20:4 n-6)	3.72^c	4.39^b	5.25^a	5.94^a	4.69^b	0.49
Eicosopentaenoic C20:5 n-3)	0.20	0.22	0.19	0.26	0.20	0.03
Docosapentaenoic (C22:5 n-3)	0.32^c	0.63^b	0.69^b	0.81^a	0.62^b	0.06
Docosahexanoic (C22:6 n-3)	0.18^c	0.38^b	0.46^b	0.61^a	0.37^b	0.06

SEM, standard error of the mean.

¹⁾

Dietary treatments: Control, commercial broiler diet; CM, 17.5% CM inclusion; CMEnz, 17.5% CM inclusion +0.3 g/kg Axtra XAP; CMPh, 17.5% CM inclusion+1.5% Potassium Humate; CMEnzPh, 17.5% CM inclusion+1.5% PH+0.3 g/kg Axtra XAP.

^a,b,c

Means in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05).