Table 3.

Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models predicting having never had an HIV test among those not reporting being HIV positive (n=241)

	% (n) never tested among those not HIV positive	OR (95% CI)	p value	Adj OR (95% CI)	p value
Gender
Male	20.9% (24)	1.95 (0.97-3.94)	0.062	2.09 (0.95-4.60)	0.067
Female (ref.)	11.9% (15)
Marital status
Married	15.9% (18)	0.97 (0.49-1.92)	0.920
Unmarried (ref.)	16.4% (21)
Age
≥40	15.8% (6)	0.95 (0.35-2.56)	0.914
30-39	15.9% (13)	0.95 (0.44-2.04)	0.898
18-29 (ref.)	16.5% (20)
Education
Some secondary or >	17.2% (15)	1.13 (0.56-2.29)	0.737
Primary or < (ref.)	15.6% (24)
Monthly income
≥ $120	17.6% (13)	0.78 (0.34-1.80)	0.555	0.55 (0.021-1.42)	0.219
$61-$119	9.3% (5)	0.37 (0.13-1.11)	0.076	0.32 (0.10-1.01)	0.052
$25-$60	14.6% (7)	0.62 (0.23-1.68)	0.350	0.54 (0.19-1.55)	0.256
< $25 (ref.)	21.5% (14)
Occupational group
CSW	13.2% (7)	0.90 (0.32-2.54)	0.839
Alcohol sellers	16.4% (9)	1.15 (0.43-3.07)	0.774
Fishermen	20.3% (13)	1.50 (0.61-3.72)	0.377
Fishmongers (ref.)	14.5% (10)
Drinking patterns/consequences
Hazardous drinking and alcohol problems	37.1% (13)	4.14 (1.84-9.29)	0.001	3.78 (1.63-8.68)	0.002
Alcohol problems only or hazardous drinking only	11.1%(2)	0.87 (0.26-3.89)	0.484	0.90 (0.46-4.49)	0.522
Low risk drinking or no drinking (ref.)	12.7% (24)
Ever met new sex partner at a drinking establishment
Yes	16.7% (7)	1.04 (0.43-2.56)	0.925
No (Ref.)	16.1% (32)

OR: Odds ratio; Adj OR: Adjusted odds ratio from multivariate model; CI: confidence interval; CSW: Commercial sex worker; CSW. Drinking patterns/consequences categories defined in text and in Table 2. Income in Ugandan Shillings converted to USD equivalents. Calculation of percentage never tested excludes from the denominator those known to be HIV positive.