Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 13;7(5):e628. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.628

Table 1.

Comparison between Frosst and newly proposed primers’ characteristics

  Frosst et al., 1995 This work
Forward primer Reverse primer Forward primer Reverse primer
Sequence (5′−3′) TGAAGGAGAAGGTGTCTGCGGGA AGGACGGTGCGGTGAGAGTG TGTGGTCTCTTCATCCCTCGC CCTTTTGGTGATGCTTGTTGGC
Tm 72°C 66°C 66°C 66°C
Tm difference (optimal <2°C) 6°Ca 0°C
Length (optimal 18−22 nt) 23 20 21 22
GC clamp Noa Noa Yes Yes
GC content (optimal 40%−60%) 56% 65%a 57% 50%
Secondary structures No No No No
Overlap between sense primer and Hinf I recognition site. Yesa Yesa No No
Simple visualization on agarose gel after RFLP Noa Noa Yes Yes
Presence of other restriction sites for Hinf I No No No No
Pairing specificity Yes Yes Yes Yes
a

Not optimal parameter.