Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 29;11:3655–3667. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S195470

Table 4.

Selected evaluation of cell nuclei (MPM versus conventional HP (H&E); mean grading system (0 [not visible], 1 [suggested without details], 2 [recognizable without further details], 3 [recognizable including all details]). Significantly better rating marked in bold and italics

MPM H&E P
Cell nuclei [mean, 95-%-CI]
Liver 0.97 [0.73–1.22] 2.87 [2.76–2.98] <0.001
Lung 0.76 [0.56–0.97] 2.42 [2.21–2.63] <0.001
Heart 0.68 [0.45–0.92] 2.71 [2.54–2.88] <0.001
Kidney 1.05 [0.81–1.29] 2.74 [2.59–2.88] <0.001
Adrenal gland 0.84 [0.65–1.04] 2.53 [2.31–2.74] <0.001
Testicle 0.95 [0.71–1.19] 2.30 [2.14–2.65] <0.001
Neuroblastoma 0.45 [0.21–0.69] 1.87 [1.56–2.18] <0.001
Rhabdomyosarcoma 0.74 [0.47–1.01] 2.40 [2.19–2.61] <0.001

Note: Bold values indicate H&E was statistically significantly superior to MPM for the evaluation of cell nuclei in all normal tissues and tumor tissues. 

Abbreviation: n.s., non-significant; MPM, multiphoton microscopy; H&E, hematoxylin-eosin.