Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 23;12:957–963. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S200988

Table 3.

comparison of biofilm formation and multi-drug resistance among CA-UTI and Com-UTI

Organisms isolated from P-value
CA-UTI (n=70) Com-UTI (n=401)
Biofilm formation 75% (n=53) 24% (n=89) 0.0001
MDR 77% (n=54) 24% (n=98) 0.0001
MRSA 82% (n=29 out of 37) 13% (n=21 out of 157) 0.0001
VRE 33% (n=8 out of 24) 3% (n=7 out of 217) 0.0001

Note: The sensitivity of CRA and TM for biofilm formation was calculated using TCP as reference method. The sensitivity and specificity of CRA was 79% and 98.5% respectively, while that of TM was 81.9% and 98.5% (Table 4).

Abbreviations: CA-UTI , catheter-associated urinary tract infection; Com-UTI, community-acquired urinary tract infection; CRA, congo red agar; MDR, multi-drug resistant; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; TCP, tissue culture plate; TM, tube method; VRE, vancomycin-resistant Enterococci.