Table 2.
Cross* | S phenotype of
progeny
|
No. of progeny | Centric fragment† | 48A RFLPs‡ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pollen | Style | ||||
S3S6 × S3S6dS | PPM | S3S6 | 8 | 1 (1) | 3 + 6 (4) |
PPM | S6S6 | 10 | 1 (1) | 3 + 6 (4) | |
S1S1 × S3S6dS | INC | S1S3 | 11 | 1 (2) | 1 + 3 (5) |
INC | S1S6 | 9 | 0 (2) | 1 + 6 (3) | |
PPM | S1S6 | 2 | 2 (2) | 1 + 3 + 6 (2) | |
S2S2 × S3S6dS | INC | S2S3 | 5 | 1 (2) | 2 + 3 (5) |
INC | S2S6 | 3 | 0 (1) | 2 + 6 (3) | |
PPM | S2S6 | 1 | 2 (2) | 2 + 3 + 6 (1) |
INC, pollen incompatibility response was the same as a wild-type plant.
In each case the PPM was the staminate parent in a cross to the indicated pistilate parent.
The number of progeny with a centric fragment (number of plants examined) is indicated.
The number of plants examined by DNA blot hybridization is indicated in parentheses.