Skip to main content
. 2001 Dec 18;98(26):15372–15376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.261571598

Table 2.

Summary of breeding and DNA blot analysis for families derived from M1-2

Cross* S phenotype of progeny
No. of progeny Centric fragment 48A RFLPs
Pollen Style
S3S6 × S3S6dSInline graphic PPM S3S6 8 1 (1) 3 + 6 (4)
PPM S6S6 10 1 (1) 3 + 6 (4)
S1S1 × S3S6dSInline graphic INC S1S3 11 1 (2) 1 + 3 (5)
INC S1S6 9 0 (2) 1 + 6 (3)
PPM S1S6 2 2 (2) 1 + 3 + 6 (2)
S2S2 × S3S6dSInline graphic INC S2S3 5 1 (2) 2 + 3 (5)
INC S2S6 3 0 (1) 2 + 6 (3)
PPM S2S6 1 2 (2) 2 + 3 + 6 (1)

INC, pollen incompatibility response was the same as a wild-type plant. 

*

In each case the PPM was the staminate parent in a cross to the indicated pistilate parent. 

The number of progeny with a centric fragment (number of plants examined) is indicated. 

The number of plants examined by DNA blot hybridization is indicated in parentheses.