Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 19.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Biol. 2018 Nov 1;28(22):3533–3546.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.09.020

Table 1. Best-fit parameters for each considered model.

The corresponding root mean squared error between the empirical median absolute orientation time course and best-fit simulation results are also shown (Figure 3G). Each model has 4 free parameters that were fit via nonlinear regression, except for the sensory delays model which has 2 free parameters. Best-fit parameters for the spatiotemporal filtering model at different wind speeds are also shown (Figures 4 and S7). Permutations over timing parameters are shown in Figure S6 for the PID and spatiotemporal filtering models. All α terms have units of º/s. All τ terms have units of s. All proportionality and integral constants (kp and ki) have units of Hz. All kd and β terms are unitless.

Model P1 P2 P3 P4 RMSE

Spatiotemporal Filtering   αv 18   αw 54   τw 1.7   βw 0.14 12.1º
 High Wind (45 cm/s)   αv 18   αw 70   τw 1.7   βw 0.14
 Low Wind (10 cm/s)   αv 18   αw 33   τw 1.7   βw 0.14
Spatial Filtering w/ Sensory Delays   αv 19   αw 15  —  — 17.1º
Dynamic Target Averaging   kp 0.005   γ 1   τw 1.16   βw 0.14 28.2º
PID Feedback Controller kp,v 0.007 kp,w 0.002 ki,w −2E−06 kd,w −0.014 15.8º