Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 27;6(Pt 3):473–491. doi: 10.1107/S2052252519003774

Table 4. Electron, mass densities and μ obtained by PXCT for the PC–CC blend paste after five months of hydration; expected mass densities taken from the CIF files (Aranda, 2016) and expected μ (Henke et al., 1993) are also given.

Phase Electron density (e Å−3) average of ten values Electron density (e Å−3) full volume Expected electron density (e Å−3) Calculated density (g cm−3) Expected density (g cm−3) Calculated μ (cm−1) (corrected) Expected μ (cm−1)
1, Monocarbo, AFt pore solution 0.45 (3) 0.48 1.36 (9) 193
3, HD_C-S-H 0.64 (1) 0.63 ∼2.05 228
4, CH 0.698 (7) 0.68 0.69 2.23 (2) 2.23 464 446.1
7, CC 0.826 (4) 0.80 0.82 2.75 (1) 2.71 411 415.2
8, C3S 0.963 (4) 0.93 0.95 3.20 (1) 3.15 649 657.8
9, C2S 0.998 (8) 0.99 0.99 3.32 (3) 3.30 639 637.3
10, MgO 1.062 (16) 1.06 1.07 3.52 (5) 3.58 211 217.4
11, C4AF 1.062 (16) 1.06 1.1 3.60 (5) 3.73 566 566.4
Capillary 0.674 (6) 0.66 2.24 (2) 2.20

Values obtained from the segmented components by Avizo software.

The expected density values are determined from crystallographic data and so they are not no available for nanocrystalline/amorphous components.