Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 11;30(1):93–98. doi: 10.1177/1040638717729396

Table 1.

Estimates of prevalence and sensitivity from model 1 at the sample level, using 4 testing methods for the isolation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from clinical specimens (n = 741).

Prevalence (%) Sensitivity (%)
Traditional 10.1 (8.1–12.5) 74.9 (64.2–83.2)
MSAox 8.9 (7.1–11.2) 66.4 (56.1–75.3)
EB with MSAox 11.2 (9.1–13.7) 84.0 (75.0–90.1)
EB with traditional 10.8 (8.8–13.2) 80.8 (71.6–87.6)
Overall 13.4 (11.1–16.0) 100.0*

Numbers in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals. EB with MSAox = enrichment broth with mannitol salt agar with 2 µg/mL of oxacillin; EB with traditional = EB with routine diagnostic method; MSAox = mannitol salt agar with 2 µg/mL of oxacillin; Overall = a positive test result on any 1 of the 4 test methods; Traditional = routine diagnostic method.

*

The overall method was used as the reference for positive samples.