Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Nucl Cardiol. 2018 Nov 7;27(6):1982–1998. doi: 10.1007/s12350-018-01471-4

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Automated motion-correction effects on global (A, B) MBF and (C, D) MFR. (A, C) Automated vs manual corrected flows. (A) Four high flow values above 5 mL·min−1·g−1 are not shown. (B, D) Uncorrected flows with differences outside of the limits of agreement (95% confidence intervals) with manual-correction flows improve after automated correction, as indicated by the connecting vertical lines, falling within the same limits of agreement in all but one case for MBF and two cases for MFR.