Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 8;12(2):57–63. doi: 10.1159/000489420

Table 2.

Clinical studies evaluating the association between MS components and FSD

Study design MS components Population Assessment of sexual activity Main results
Systolic blood pressure intervention trial (SPRINT) [33] systemic arterial hypertension 635 postmenopausal women FSFI systemic arterial hypertension was not associated with FSD
Observational, prospective, cross-sectional descriptive study [34] systemic arterial hypertension 157 postmenopausal women FSFI hypertension was related to sexual dysfunction
Cohort study [35] systemic arterial hypertension 540 postmenopausal women FSFI significant association between systemic arterial hypertension and FSD
Cohort study [36] systemic arterial hypertension 1,390 postmenopausal women systemic arterial hypertension was not associated with FSD
Case-control study [37] systemic arterial hypertension 417 pre- and post-menopausal women FSFI FSD was present in 42.1% of hypotensive women and 19.4% of normotensive women
Case-control study [38] obesity 120 pre- and post-menopausal women Iranian version of FSFI obesity was related to female sexual dysfunction
Case-control study [39] obesity 91 premenopausal women FSFI no significant relationship between obesity and FSD
Population-based study [40] obesity 1,266 pre- and post-menopausal women FSFI no significant association between obesity and FSD
Case-control study [41] dyslipidemia 466 pre- and post-menopausal women FSFI
FSDS
MHQ
dyslipidemia was associated with FSD
Case-control study [2] dyslipidemia 208 menopausal women FSFI
FSDS
MHQ
hypertriglyceridemia was linked to FSD
Case-control study [42] dyslipidemia 556 premenopausal women FSFI women with hyperlipidemia had lower arousal, orgasm, lubrication, and satisfaction
Cross-sectional study [43] diabetesmellitus 236 premenopausal women FSFI FSD was present in both type 1 and type 2 diabetesmellitus
Case-control study [44] type 2 diabetes mellitus 260 premenopausal women FSFI type 2 diabetes was associated with lower sexual desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, sexual satisfaction
Diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study (DCCT/EDIC) [45] type 1 diabetes mellitus 580 pre- and post-menopausal women FSFI type 1 diabetes with autonomic neuropathy was associated with FSD
Cross-sectional single-center study [46] type 2 diabetes mellitus 93 pre- and post-menopausal women FSFI type 2 diabetes was associated with arousal, desire, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction problems and pain during sexual intercourse
Case-control study [47] type 1 diabetes mellitus 170 pre- and post-menopausal women FSFI
FSDS
type 1 diabetes was significantly associated with higher FSD frequency
Cross-sectional study [48] type 2 diabetes mellitus 150 premenopausal women FSFI type 2 diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with reduced lubrication, sexual desire, arousal problems, dyspareunia, orgasmic dysfunction
Case-control study [49] type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus 118 premenopausal women FSFI type 1, but not type 2 diabetes mellitus was associated with FSD, particularly lubrication, arousal, orgasm, dyspareunia
Cross-sectional study [50] type 2 diabetes mellitus 110 pre- and post-menopausal women FSFI type 2 diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with FSD
Case-control study [51] type 1 diabetes mellitus 200 premenopausal women FSFI diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with FSD
Case-control study [52] type 2 diabetes mellitus 222 pre- and post-menopausal women FSFI type 2 diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with FSD
Cross-sectional study [53] diabetes mellitus 2,270 pre- and post-menopausal women FSFI insulin-treated diabetes mellitus was associated to FSD, particularly reduced lubrication and orgasm
Case-control study [54] type 1 diabetes mellitus 144 pre- and post-menopausal women FSFI no significant relationship between type 1 diabetesmellitus and FSD
Cross-section study [55] diabetes mellitus 544 pre- and post-menopausal women FSFI diabetesMellituswas associated with orgasmic dysfunctions
Cross-section study [56] diabetes mellitus 1,291 pre- and post-menopausal women BACH FSFI type 1 diabetes mellitus was associated with greater pain with sexual intercourse. Type 2 diabetes was related to better orgasm scores and satisfaction
Case-control study [57] diabetesmellitus 88 pre- and post-menopausal women FSFI significant relationship between type 1 diabetes mellitus and FSD
Prospective cohort study [58] type 1 diabetes mellitus 652 pre- and post-menopausal women FSFI type 1 diabetes mellitus was associated with loss of libido, orgasm disorders, lubrication and arousal and pain

FSDS = Female sexual distress scale; FSFI = female sexual function index; MHQ = middlesex hospital questionnaire; BACH FSFI = Boston Area Community Health Survey Female Sexual Function Index.