Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bone. 2019 Mar 12;123:8–17. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.03.013

Table 3:

Pearson’s correlations, 95% intervals, and p values between histomorphometric measures (porosity and pore size) and μCT-based results (porosity and BMD). Significance for all correlations were assessed using non-parametric bootstrap (with resampling by specimen) to adjust for within-specimen dependence.

μCT

Porosity BMD

 Histomorphometry  Porosity All pores 0.86
[0.74,0.95]
p<0.01
−0.81
[−0.62,−0.92]
P<0.01
Small pores
(<40 μm)
0.29
[−0.08,0.61]
p=0.19
−0.71
[−0.83,−0.43]
P<0.01
Large pores
(>40 μm)
0.87
[0.74,0.94]
p<0.01
−0.76
[−0.89,−0.52]
P<0.01

 Pore size All pores 0.78
[0.61,0.90]
p<0.01
−0.65
[−0.80,−0.35]
P<0.01
Small pores
(<40 μm)
0.26
[−0.18,0.56]
p=0.23
−0.44
[−0.72,−0.10]
p=0.06
Large pores
(>40 μm)
0.78
[0.60,0.88]
p<0.01
−0.71
[−0.82,−0.42]
P<0.01