Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 5;14:37–48. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2019.02.002

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Simulation results using the cepstral analysis method. (a) Geometries of phantoms for various grid (G) to random (R) ratio and (b) their corresponding PA B-mode images. (c) Power cepstrum of the 15:85% phantom with star denoting the location of the first peak. (d) Comparison of the estimated absorber with the true spacing for various number densities.