Skip to main content
. 2019 May 7;19:122. doi: 10.1186/s12935-019-0843-9

Table 1.

Comparison of clinical and molecular characteristics with miR-25 expression in patients with AML

Characteristic Chemotherapy group Allo-HSCT group
High miR-25
(n = 45)
Low miR-25
(n = 45)
P High miR-25
(n = 36)
Low miR-25
(n = 36)
P
Age/years, median 61.4 (22–82) 64.4 (31–88) 0.49 47.3 (22–72) 49.4 (18–69) 0.535
Age group/n (%) (years) 0.495 0.793
 < 60 16 (35.6) 12 (26.7) 27 (75) 25 (69.4)
 ≥ 60 29 (64.4) 33 (73.3) 9 (25) 11 (30.6)
Gender/n (%) 0.289 0.634
 Male 22 (48.9) 28 (62.2) 22 (61.1) 19 (52.8)
 Female 23 (51.1) 17 (37.8) 14 (38.9) 17 (47.2)
WBC/× 109/L, median 32.4 (0.7–297.4) 51.8 (1.5–298.4) 0.059 36.0 (0.6–223.8) 39.8 (1.2–118.8) 0.248
BM blast/%, median 69 (32–99) 67.2 (30–92) 0.955 66.2 (34–99) 70.2 (30–100) 0.277
PB blast/%, median 39.5 (0–98) 35.1 (0–97) 0.320 46.1 (0–96) 48.9 (0–94) 0.752
FAB subtypes/n (%)
 M0 4 (8.9) 4 (8.9) 1.000 6 (16.7) 3 (8.3) 0.478
 M1 13 (28.9) 7 (15.6) 0.204 7 (19.4) 16 (44.4) 0.042
 M2 12 (26.7) 9 (20) 0.619 12 (33.3) 7 (19.4) 0.285
 M4 11 (24.4) 13 (28.9) 0.812 8 (22.2) 6 (16.7) 0.767
 M5 4 (8.9) 9 (20) 0.230 2 (5.6) 2 (5.6) 1.000
 M6 1 (2.2) 0 (0.0) 1.000 0 (0.0) 1 (2.8) 1.000
 M7 0 (0.0) 2 (4.4) 0.494 1 (2.8) 0 (0.0) 1.000
 No date 0 (0.0) 1 (2.2) 1.000 0 (0.0) 1 (2.8) 1.000
Karyotype/n (%)
 Normal 18 (40) 26 (57.8) 0.140 15 (41.7) 19 (52.7) 0.479
 Complex 5 (11.1) 7 (15.6) 0.758 6 (16.6) 6 (16.6) 1.000
 Poor 0 (0.0) 5 (11.1) 0.056 1 (2.8) 4 (11.1) 0.357
 Intermediate 8 (17.8) 2 (4.4) 0.090 6 (16.7) 3 (8.4) 0.478
 MLL 1 (2.2) 2 (4.4) 1.000 3 (8.3) 0 (0.0) 0.239
 CBFβ-MYH11 6 (13.3) 1 (2.2) 0.110 4 (11.1) 1 (2.8) 0.357
 BCR-ABL1 0 (0.0) 1 (2.2) 1.000 0 (0.0) 2 (5.6) 0.493
 RUNX1-RUNX1T1 6 (13.3) 0 (0.0) 0.026 1 (2.8) 0 (0.0) 1.000
 N.D. 1 (2.2) 1 (2.2) 1.000 0 (0.0) 1 (2.8) 1.000
Risk(cyto)/n (%)
 Good 12 (26.7) 1 (2.2) 0.002 5 (13.9) 1 (2.8) 0.199
 Intermediate 26 (57.8) 29 (64.4) 0.665 21 (58.3) 20 (55.5) 1.000
 Poor 6 (13.3) 14 (31.1) 0.074 10 (27.8) 14 (38.9) 0.454
 Other 1 (2.2) 1 (2.2) 1.000 0 (0.0) 1 (2.8) 1.000
FLT3-ITD/n (%) 0.784 0.045
 Presence 9 (20.0) 7 (15.6) 4 (11.1) 12 (33.3)
 Absence 36 (80.0) 38 (84.4) 32 (88.9) 24 (66.7)
NPM1/n (%) 0.175 0.064
 Presence 11 (24.4) 18 (40) 6 (16.7) 14 (38.9)
 Absence 34 (75.6) 27 (60) 36 (83.3) 22 (61.1)
DNMT3A/n (%) 0.157 1.000
 Presence 9 (20) 16 (35.6) 9 (25) 9 (25)
 Absence 36 (80) 29 (64.6) 27 (75) 27 (75)
RUNX1/n (%) 0.714 0.710
 Presence 5 (11.1) 3 (6.7) 5 (13.9) 3 (8.3)
 Absence 40 (89.9) 42 (93.3) 31 (86.1) 33 (91.7)
MLL-PTD/n (%) 1.000
 Presence 2 (4.4) 3 (6.7) 2 (5.6) 2 (5.6)
 Absence 43 (95.6) 42 (93.3) 34 (94.4) 34 (94.4)
TP53/n (%) 0.522 1.000
 Mutation 4 (8.9) 7 (15.6) 2 (5.6) 2 (5.6)
 Wild type 41 (91.1) 38 (84.4) 34 (94.4) 34 (94.4)
CEBPA/n (%) 1.000 0.055
 Mutation 1 (2.2) 2 (4.4) 7 (19.4) 1 (2.8)
 Wild type 44 (97.8) 43 (95.6) 29 (80.6) 35 (97.2)
IDH1/n (%) 1.000 0.514
 Mutation 3 (6.7) 4 (8.9) 4 (11.1) 7 (19.4)
 Wild type 42 (93.3) 41 (91.1) 32 (88.9) 29 (80.6)
IDH2/n (%) 1.000 0.260
 Mutation 5 (11.1) 4 (8.9) 2 (5.6) 6 (16.7)
 Wild type 40 (88.9) 41 (91.1) 34 (94.4) 30 (83.3)

Mann–Whitney test was used for continuous variables. Chi square tests were used for categorical variables

WBC white blood cell, BM bone marrow, PB peripheral blood, FAB French–American–British classification