Skip to main content
. 2019 May 7;19:129. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1143-x

Table 3.

Outcome: decision making by study groups at the end of the intervention and at follow up

Overall score/100 web/DVD mean SD Booklet mean SD Unadjusted treatment effect (95% CI) Unadjusted P Adjusted treatment effect (95% CI) Adjusted P and (partial Eta2)
Primary Decision elf Efficacy Scale End of the intervention (n = 62/69) 85.4 (13.0) 81.6 (20.9) 3.8 (−2.1 to 9.7) 0.21 3.8 (−2.0 to 9.6) 0.20 (0.01)
2 months follow up (n = 62/69) 87.2 (11.9) 82.8 (19.9) 4.4 (−1.15 to 9.95) 0.12 2.7 (−2.8 to 8.3) 0.33 (0.01)
Secondary Preparation for Decision Making Scale End of the intervention (n = 62/69) 64.9 (25.8) 58.3 (27.7) 8.6 (−2.5 to 15.7) 0.16 6.3 (−2.8 to 15.4) 0.18 (0.001)
2 months follow up (n = 62/69) 60. (28.1) 58.0 (26.2) 2.1 (−7.2 to 11.4) 0.66 0.2 (−9.1 to 9.5) 0.97 (0.013)

CI confidence interval, treatment effect is mean difference