Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2019 Mar 21;54:168–178. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2019.03.003

Table 1:

Quantitative comparison of the segmentation results of three male pelvic organs by different networks. (The best results are indicated in bold, with asterisks implying statistical significance (p < 0.05)).

Metric FCN-8s U-net Dilated U-net Ours
Prostate DSC
p value
0.83±0.08
4.3E-8∗
0.85±0.07
1.1E-5∗
0.86±0.05
1.8E-6∗
0.89±0.03
N/A
ASD
p value
2.12±1.02
4.3E-10∗
2.01±1.14
2.9E-10∗
1.78±0.81
4.6E-8∗
1.32±0.76
N/A
Bladder DSC
p value
0.89±0.13
2.0E-4∗
0.91±0.04
1.9E-3∗
0.91±0.06
2.4E-4∗
0.94±0.03
N/A
ASD
p value
2.12±2.41
7.0E-11∗
4.30±2.07
2.8E-13∗
1.53±1.25
1.6E-8∗
1.15±0.65
N/A
Rectum DSC
p value
0.84±0.06
1.4E-5∗
0.86±0.05
9.8E-5∗
0.87±0.06
1.6E-4∗
0.89±0.04
N/A
ASD
p value
2.02±0.94
7.2E-4∗
2.14±1.86
3.9E-5∗
1.71±1.45
2.6E-4∗
1.53±0.91
N/A