Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 17;34(3):608–617. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2017.063

Table 3.

Summary of nine studies comparing the RECIST and PERCIST

Study Tumor type No. of pts Treatment Comparison Discordant rate, % Details of discordance
RECIST→ EORTC
Thacker et al. (2012) [15] Basal cell carcinoma 14 Targeted agent (vismodegib) RECIST 1.0 vs. PERCIST 50 (7/14) 2 PR→1 CMR, 1 SMD
4 SD→4 PMR
1 PD→1 SMD
Aras et al. (2016) [20] Colorectal cancer 20 Palliative chemotherapy RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 18.3 (11/60) 4 PR→3 CMR, 1 SMD
Lung cancer 16 7 SD→7 PMR
Stomach cancer 12
Head & neck cancer 6
Breast cancer 6
Shang et al. (2016) [21] Non-small cell lung cancer 35 Chemotherapy RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 62.9 (22/35) 18 SD→14 PMR, 4 PMD
4 PD→4 SMD
Ding et al. (2014) [22] Non-small cell lung cancer 44 Palliative chemotherapy RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 34.1 (15/44) 6 PR→4 CMR, 2 SMD
9 SD→1 CMR, 7 PMR, 1 PMD
Skougaard et al. (2014) [23] Colorectal cancer 61 Palliative chemotherapy RECIST 1.0 vs. PERCIST 54.1 (33/61) 1 PR→1 SMD
24 SD→20 PMR, 4 PMD
8 PD→4 PMR, 4 SMD
Yanagawa et al. (2012) [24]a Esophageal cancer 46 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 56.5 (26/46) 13 PR→13 CMR
13 SD→3 CMR, 10 PMR
Agrawal et al. (2014) [25] Breast cancer 22 Metronomic palliative hemotherapy RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 20.6 (9/43) 8 SD→1 CMR, 1 PMR, 6 PMD
PNET 5 1 PD→1 CMR
Head & neck cancer 4
Sarcoma 3
NHL 2
Esophageal cancer 2
Others 5
Riedl et al. (2017) [26] Breast cancer 65 Chemotherapy, targeted therapy, hormonal therapy RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 52.3 (34/65) 10 PR→10 CMR
20 SD→6 CMR, 8 PMR, 6 PMD
4 PD→3 CMR, 1 SMD
Bang et al. (2017) [27] Colorectal cancer 39 Targeted therapy (regorafenib) RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 61.5 (24/39) 1 PR→1 SMD
17 SD→14 PMR, 3 PMD
6 PD→3 PMR, 3 SMD
Summary Colorectal cancer 120 RECIST vs. PERCIST 44.5 (181/407) 37 PR→31 CMR, 6 SMD
Lung cancer 95 120 SD→11 CMR, 85 PMR, 24 PMD
Breast cancer 93 24 PD→4 CMR, 7 PMR, 13 SMD
Esophageal cancer 48
Basal cell carcinoma 14
Stomach cancer 12
Head & neck cancer 10
Others 16

RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; PERCIST, Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid umors; pts, patients; PR, partial response; CMR, complete metabolic response; SMD, stable metabolic disease; SD, stable disease; PMR, partial metabolic response; PD, progressive disease; PMD, progressive metabolic disease; PNET, primitive neuroectodermal tumor; NHL, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

a

Five patients were excluded from the final analysis because their disease was not classifiable according to the RECIST 1.1.