Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 6;70(10):2773–2786. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz083

Table 2.

Leaf photosynthetic traits estimated on gdch-KD and WT plants under approximately current ambient and below current ambient O2 levels (pO2 of 18.4 kPa and 1.84 kPa, respectively) at Ca of 27.6 Pa.

Plant-type pO2 A g sC C i C i /C a g m a C c Δo
(kPa) (µmol CO2 m−2 s−1) (µmol CO2 m−2 s−1 Pa−1) (Pa) (µmol CO2 m−2 s−1 Pa−1) (Pa) (‰)
gdch-KD 1.84 24.7±1.4 3.47±0.53 18.1±0.8 0.66±0.03 4.56±0.43 12.6±1.4 14.9±0.7
18.4 6.3±0.3 1.37±0.11 22.1±0.2 0.80±0.01 20.6±0.2 23.7±0.5
WT 1.84 21.6±1.2 2.78±0.43 18.5±0.9 0.67±0.03 3.80±0.76 12.6±0.5 14.3±0.8
18.4 14.3±0.8 2.45±0.31 20.5±0.5 0.74±0.02 4.07±0.14 17.0±0.6 17.8±0.3
Significance Plant type P=0.050 P=0.629 P=0.411 P=0.411 P=0.031 P=0.003
pO2 P<0.001 P=0.018 P=0.003 P=0.003 P=0.000 P<0.001
Plant type×pO2 P=0.002 P=0.057 P=0.171 P=0.171 P=0.033 P=0.003

Values are the mean±SE (n=4). Significance (P<0.05) of the effects of plant type, pO2, and plant type×pO2 interaction were evaluated by SAS PROC MIXED.

a No significant differences were evaluated by a two sample t-test (significance for P<0.05) between the gdch-KD and WT gm values at a pO2 of 1.84 kPa (P=0.586), and the WT gm values at the two pO2 values (P=0.701).