Table 2.
Plant-type | pO2 | A | g sC | C i | C i /C a | g m a | C c | Δo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(kPa) | (µmol CO2 m−2 s−1) | (µmol CO2 m−2 s−1 Pa−1) | (Pa) | (µmol CO2 m−2 s−1 Pa−1) | (Pa) | (‰) | ||
gdch-KD | 1.84 | 24.7±1.4 | 3.47±0.53 | 18.1±0.8 | 0.66±0.03 | 4.56±0.43 | 12.6±1.4 | 14.9±0.7 |
18.4 | 6.3±0.3 | 1.37±0.11 | 22.1±0.2 | 0.80±0.01 | 20.6±0.2 | 23.7±0.5 | ||
WT | 1.84 | 21.6±1.2 | 2.78±0.43 | 18.5±0.9 | 0.67±0.03 | 3.80±0.76 | 12.6±0.5 | 14.3±0.8 |
18.4 | 14.3±0.8 | 2.45±0.31 | 20.5±0.5 | 0.74±0.02 | 4.07±0.14 | 17.0±0.6 | 17.8±0.3 | |
Significance | Plant type | P=0.050 | P=0.629 | P=0.411 | P=0.411 | – | P=0.031 | P=0.003 |
pO2 | P<0.001 | P=0.018 | P=0.003 | P=0.003 | – | P=0.000 | P<0.001 | |
Plant type×pO2 | P=0.002 | P=0.057 | P=0.171 | P=0.171 | – | P=0.033 | P=0.003 |
Values are the mean±SE (n=4). Significance (P<0.05) of the effects of plant type, pO2, and plant type×pO2 interaction were evaluated by SAS PROC MIXED.
a No significant differences were evaluated by a two sample t-test (significance for P<0.05) between the gdch-KD and WT gm values at a pO2 of 1.84 kPa (P=0.586), and the WT gm values at the two pO2 values (P=0.701).