Table 2.
Method | Pc = 0% | Pc = 20% | Pc = 50% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median | Mean | Sim SE | Median | Mean | Sim SE | Median | Mean | Sim SE | |
Median ‘ | −0.01 | 0.00 | 0.05 | − 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.05 | −0.01 | 0.00 | 0.05 |
Q1Q3_1 | −0.68 | −0.68 | 0.06 | −0.68 | − 0.68 | 0.06 | − 0.68 | −0.68 | 0.06 |
Q1Q3_2 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.07 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.07 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.07 |
MinP | −0.42 | −0.40 | 0.13 | −0.47 | −0.48 | 0.15 | −0.73 | − 0.74 | 0.16 |
OEHR_1 | −0.58 | − 0.61 | 0.20 | −0.65 | − 0.65 | 0.19 | − 0.80 | − 0.77 | 0.22 |
OEHR_2 | 1.17 | 1.18 | 0.11 | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.10 | 1.30 | 1.29 | 0.13 |
Pc = censoring proportion; Sim SE = simulation standard error; Median ‘= using the median value of the continuous covariate as a cut-point; Q1Q3 = using the upper and lower quartiles values as cut-points, Q1Q3_1 is the upper quartile value and Q1Q3_2 is the lower quantile value; MinP = the single cut-point minimum p-value method with log-rank test; OHER = the optimal equal-HR method proposed in this study, OEHR_1 is the left estimated cut-point and OEHR_2 is the right estimated cut-point