Table 3.
Method | Pc = 0% | Pc = 20% | Pc = 50% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median | Mean | Sim SE | Median | Mean | Sim SE | Median | Mean | Sim SE | |
Median ‘ | −0.01 | 0.00 | 0.05 | −0.01 | 0.00 | 0.05 | −0.01 | 0.00 | 0.05 |
Q1Q3_1 | −0.68 | −0.68 | 0.06 | −0.68 | − 0.68 | 0.06 | − 0.68 | −0.68 | 0.06 |
Q1Q3_2 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.07 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.07 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.07 |
MinP | −0.08 | −0.08 | 0.15 | −0.19 | −0.20 | 0.17 | −0.51 | − 0.51 | 0.20 |
OEHR_1 | −0.41 | −0.39 | 0.23 | −0.45 | − 0.46 | 0.24 | − 0.60 | −0.59 | 0.26 |
OEHR_2 | 1.49 | 1.49 | 0.08 | 1.51 | 1.52 | 0.08 | 1.55 | 1.55 | 0.10 |
Pc = censoring proportion; Sim SE = simulation standard error; Median ‘= using the median value of the continuous covariate as a cut-point; Q1Q3 = using the upper and lower quartiles values as cut-points, Q1Q3_1 is the upper quartile value and Q1Q3_2 is the lower quantile value; MinP = the single cut-point minimum p-value method with log-rank test; OHER = the optimal equal-HR method proposed in this study, OEHR_1 is the left estimated cut-point and OEHR_2 is the right estimated cut-point