Skip to main content
. 2019 May 9;5:65. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0448-z

Table 1.

Clinician reported measures and time-points for data collection

Construct Instrument Before course After course 4 months Patient baseline registration
Individual characteristics Age, sex, profession, role in the clinic x
Experience Years of clinical experience x
Experience with GLA:D for knee and hip
Confidence The Practitioner Confidence Scale (range 4–20) [14] x x
Treatment orientation The Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists [1517]. Biomedical subscale (range 10–60), behavioural subscale (range 9–54) x x
Evaluation of 2-day course Content (0 = very poor; 10 = excellent) x
Novelty (0 = very low; 10 = very high)
Usability (0 = very poor; 10 = very good)
Adoption Did you start offering GLA:D Back in the clinic? x x
How many groups have started?
Number of patients in the registry
Overall impression Everything considered, how do you think GLA:D Back works? (5-points Likert: very bad to very good) x
Materials How satisfied are you with the patient education materials? (0 = very unsatisfied; 10 = very satisfied) x
How satisfied are you with the exercise programme? (0 = very unsatisfied; 10 = very satisfied)