Table 2.
Advantages, Disadvantages, and Limitations of the Pink Pad Technique
| Advantages | Disadvantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Eliminates post-related complications. | Lighter patients (<∼120 pounds) may require greater degrees of Trendelenburg to achieve distraction. | Surgeon bias toward a perineal post. |
| Less early postoperative pain (fewer opioids, better early recovery). | Possible anterior tilt of the pelvis with increased lumbar lordosis. | Learning curve that surgeons need to invest in. |
| Strong distraction force, using gravity and friction— as strong, if not stronger than with use of perineal post, especially with heavier patients, tight stiff hips. | Cannot slide patient up or down the bed; must lift the patient completely off the pad and translate up/down. The friction between pad and patient is too great to permit sliding. | |
| Permits greater range of motion for arthroscopic and fluoroscopic dynamic examination to assess osseous corrections and possible locations of impingement. | ||
| Pad can be used on your normal operating room table without buying a completely new table and distractor legs. | ||
| Learning curve for positioning is 1 to 5 cases. | ||
| Inexpensive single-use item with small size easy for local operating room storage. | ||
| Permits central compartment traction-dependent work with less concern for time (surgeon learning curve, teaching trainees and fellow surgeons, more complicated lengthier cases [large posterolateral pincer, protrusio, complete labral reconstruction]). |