Table 3.
QTLs for capsanthin content at each ripening stage detected in this study
| Experiment | Trait | Dataseta | LG | QTL ID | Markerb | Position | LOD | R2c | Additive effectd | Thresholde |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1–2 | Content at 45 DAF | 5 | 15 | Cst15.1 | GPMS001 CAMS378 |
28.9 | 5.0 | 16.1 | 501.0 | 3.3 |
| Content at 90 DAF | 6 | 13 | Cst13.1 | EPMS376, HpmsE072 ge075-422pmc0296C |
51.8 | 4.0 | 17.0 | 778.0 | 2.7 | |
| 1 | Content at 45 DAF | 1 | 15 | Cst15.1 | GPMS001 CAMS378 |
28.9 | 5.0 | 16.1 | 501.0 | 3.4 |
| Content at 90 DAF | 2 | 13 | Cst13.1 | EPMS376, HpmsE072 ge075-422pmc0296C |
51.8 | 4.0 | 17.0 | 778.0 | 2.8 | |
| 2 | Content at 90 DAF | 4 | 7 | Cst7.1 | CAMS424 ge274-261pmc0414W |
45.8 | 6.0 | 15.1 | −675.9 | 2.9 |
| 15 | Cst15.1 | CAeMS015 GPMS001 |
24.6 | 4.6 | 10.8 | 529.5 | 2.9 |
a
Details of datasets are shown in Supplemental Table 1.
b
Nearest markers on both sides of QTL.
c
Percentage of phenotypic variation explained.
d
Positive values indicate alleles from ‘S3586’.
e
The significance threshold for QTL detection by 1000 permutations at P < 0.05.