Skip to main content
. 2019 May 9;14(5):e0216471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216471

Table 1. Comparison between NanoR, poRe, IONiseR, poretools and HPG pore.

Feature NanoR poRe IONiseR poretools HPG Pore
Extract .fastq from .fast5 files*
Extract .fasta from .fast5 files*
Extract metadata from .fast5 files*
Calculate/plot GC content*
Plot yield*
Plot reads and base pairs number per time bin*
Plot min/mean/max reads quality and length per time bin*
Plot reads length versus reads quality*
Plot reads length histograms* 1
Plot reads quality histograms* 2
Plot channels and muxes occupancy* 3
Plot reads and base pairs number per channel histograms*
Plot pass/fail/skip .fast5 files number and percentage*
Analyze GridION X5 outputs**
Analyze MinION/GridION X5 multi-read .fast5 files
Compare MinION/GridION X5 data

1 NanoR plots reads length histograms for each experiment when plotting reads length versus reads quality

2 NanoR plots reads quality histograms for each experiment when plotting reads length versus reads quality

3 Poretools does not plot muxes occupancy

* These features refers to MinION single-read data analysis

** poRe, IONiseR, poretools and HPG pore are not specifically designed to work with GridION X5 outputs; however, since from release 18.12.1 MinION and GridION X5 outputs are the same, theoretically these tools can work with GridION X5 single-read basecalled .fast5 files while they cannot work with default outputs from previous releases.