Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Mar 21;48(5):876–890. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01013-2

Table 3.

Student Outcomes Predicted by Intervention Condition

Student Outcome 95% CI
Lower
Bound
b 95% CI
Upper
Bound
t (11) 95% CI
Lower
Bound
d 95% CI
Upper
Bound

Clarity/ Consistency −0.083 0.005 0.093 0.13 −1.02 0.07 1.16
Teacher Support −0.071 0.099 0.269 1.28 −0.43 0.71 1.83
Positive Peer Interactions −0.142 0.015 0.171 0.21 −0.98 0.12 1.21
Student Input −0.056 0.139 0.334 1.57 −0.29 0.87 2.00
School Connectedness −0.090 0.090 0.288 1.15 −0.50 0.64 1.75
Peer Attachment −0.090 0.099 0.288 1.15 −0.50 0.64 1.75
Social Skill: Assertiveness −0.190 0.031 0.253 0.31 –0.92 0.17 1.26
Social Skill: Empathy −0.051 0.036 0.123 0.91 −0.62 0.51 1.61
Logistic
b
Standard
Error
t (11) 95% CI
Lower
Bound
Odds
Ratio
95% CI
Upper
Bound
Physical Bullying 0.167 0.224 0.74 0.72 1.18 1.93
Emotional Bullying 0.063 0.160 0.39 0.75 1.06 1.51
Cyber Bullying −0.113 0.262 −0.43 0.50 0.89 1.59

Note: N = 1,685; k (schools) = 13. None of the coefficients by intervention condition were statistically significant, p < 0.05, after FDR correction. Covariates not shown.