Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 19;40(9):2677–2698. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24552

Table 4.

The results of the whole‐brain ANOVA analysis for the phonological processing task are listed

Voxels p value x (mm) y (mm) z (mm) Label Post hoc t tests corrected for multiple comparisons
201 0.00011 −36 −28 38 Left supramarginal gyrus TYP > COM
186 0.00022 −36 30 22 Left inferior frontal gyrus (BA 45) TYP, ADHD > RD, COM
166 0.00026 20 12 44 Right superior frontal gyrus TYP > RD, ADHD, COM
98 0.00020 6 −42 46 Right superior parietal lobe TYP > ADHD
89 0.00002 −60 −12 16 Left superior temporal gyrus TYP, COM > RD, ADHD
86 0.00044 −34 6 2 Left inferior frontal gyrus (BA 44) TYP > RD
77 0.00074 −38 −12 42 Left postcentral gyrus TYP > COM
67 0.00093 −42 −62 −40 Left cerebellum TYP > RD, ADHD, COM
57 0.00035 50 22 22 Right inferior frontal gyrus TYP > ADHD, COM
48 0.00148 −36 −6 18 Left superior temporal gyrus TYP > RD
40 0.00025 −26 −76 −18 Left fusiform gyrus TYP, ADHD, COM > RD
35 0.00085 42 −28 22 Right superior temporal gyrus TYP, COM, RD > ADHD
30 0.00060 −18 −10 12 Left thalamus TYP > ADHD, COM
26 0.00097 24 −24 10 Right thalamus TYP > ADHD, COM
21 0.00149 −58 0 6 Left planum temporale TYP > RD, ADHD, COM
20 0.00146 −20 −62 10 Left occipitotemporal gyrus TYP > RD, ADHD, COM

The table displays the clusters with the p value, the number of voxels, the MNI coordinates and the annotation. In addition, the post hoc t tests demonstrate the specific group differences only for the comparisons that survive correction of multiple comparisons.