Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 5;62(6):948–958. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4856-7

Table 3.

 Treatment difference between evolocumab vs placebo for lipid variables

Variable Week 12 Mean of weeks 10 and 12
Lipid efficacy, mean (95% CI) treatment difference
 Change from baseline in LDL-C, % −53.1 (−57.6, −48.7) −64.1 (−68.2, −60.1)
 Achievement of LDL-C <1.81 mmol/l, % 69.1 (60.4, 75.7) 77.9 (70.0, 83.5)
 Achievement of ≥50% reduction in LDL-C, % 64.7 (57.7, 70.3) 83.5 (77.7, 87.4)
Per cent change from baseline in other lipids, mean (95% CI) treatment difference
 Non-HDL-C −46.3 (−50.4, −42.2) −56.6 (−60.3, −52.9)
 ApoB −42.1 (−46.1, −38.1) −52.5 (−56.1, −48.9)
 Total cholesterol −33.7 (−36.9, −30.6) −41.1 (−43.9, −38.2)
 Lp(a) −32.6 (−39.6, −25.5) −40.5 (−48.1, −32.9)
 Triacylglycerol −13.7 (−21.6, −5.8) −19.3 (−26.0, −12.5)
 HDL-C 7.4 (4.2, 10.6) 9.8 (7.0, 12.6)
 VLDL-C −13.3 (−20.1, −6.6) −17.1 (−22.9, −11.2)

Placebo, n=141; evolocumab, n=280

All adjusted p values for measures reported in the table were p<0.0001 for evolocumab vs placebo comparison