Skip to main content
. 2019 May 9;10:2116. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09904-5

Table 1.

Optimization of the reaction conditions

graphic file with name 41467_2019_9904_Figa_HTML.gif
4a 5a
entry Ligand (L) Mg(OTf)2: L T (°C) Yield (%)a e.r.b Yield (%)a e.r.b
1 L-PrPr 2 1.0:1.0 35 29 82:18 53 92.5:7.5
2 L-PiPr 2 1.0:1.0 35 97 82:18
3 L-RaPr 2 1.0:1.0 35 38 83.5:16.5 46 96:4
4 L-RaPr 3 1.0:1.0 35 36 72:28 43 86.5:13.5
5 L-RaPr 2 1.5:1.0 35 88 94:6
6 L-RaPr 2 1.0:1.5 35 53 88:12 25 95.5:4.5
7c L-RaPr 2 1.4:1.0 30 91 94.5:5.5
8d L-RaPr 2 1.0:1.5 −40 57 94.5:5.5
9d,e L-RaPr 2 1.0:1.5 −40 73 95:5
10f L-RaPr 2 1.0:1.5 −40 then −20 91 95:5

Unless otherwise noted, all reactions were carried out with 1a (0.10 mmol), 2a (0.12 mmol), 3a (0.10 mmol), and Mg(OTf)2/L-RaPr2 (1.0:1.0, 10 mol%) in CH2Cl2 (1.0 mL) at 35 °C for 3 h

aIsolated yield

bDetermined by CSP-HPLC analysis

cCarried out with 1a (0.20 mmol), 2a (0.24 mmol), 3a (0.20 mmol), and Mg(OTf)2/L-RaPr2 (1.4:1.0, 10 mol%) in CH2ClCH2Cl (1.0 mL) at 30 °C for 3 h

d−40 °C for 7 days

eWith 5 Å MS (10 mg) as the additive

fCarried out with 1a (0.10 mmol), 2a (0.15 mmol), 3a (0.15 mmol), 5 Å MS (10 mg), and Mg(OTf)2/L-RaPr2 (1.0/1.5, 10 mol%) in CH2Cl2 (1.0 mL) at −40 °C for 2 days, then −20 °C for 3 days