Skip to main content
. 2019 May 9;9:7160. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43682-w

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Effect of miR-21 and miR-10 on wound closure. (A) Mouse skin wounds (n = 6) were treated with miR-21 mimic or negative control mimic at the time of injury, and wound closure was measured for 10 days. Statistical significant changes in wound closure were observed between wounds treated with miR-21 mimic and wounds treated with negative control mimic (two-way ANOVA test p < 0.0001). *Indicates statistical significant difference at specific time point (multiple t-test p < 0.05). Statistical analyses were presented in Supplementary Table S8. (B) Representative photomicrographs of microRNA mimic treated wounds taken at the time points indicated. (C) Mouse skin wounds (n = 6) were treated with LNA inhibitor for miR-10b or negative control LNA at the time of injury, and wound closure was measured for 10 days. Statistical significant changes in wound closure were observed between wounds treated with miR-10b LNA inhibitor and wounds treated with negative control LNA (two-way ANOVA test p = 0.0001). *Indicates statistical significant difference at specific time point (multiple t-test p < 0.05). Statistical analyses were presented in Supplementary Table S8. (D) Representative photomicrographs of LNA treated wounds taken at the time points indicated. Scale bar = 2 mm.