Skip to main content
. 2019 May 9;9:7123. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42808-4

Table 4.

Comparison of genotypic distributions between the inactive group and patients with active HBV, cirrhosis and HCC patients.

SNPs Genotype/Allele distribution Inactive (n = 563) % Active, cirrhosis and HCC (n = 311) % OR (95% C.I.) χ² p-value
rs2723176 CC 518 92.01% 276 88.75% Ref
AC 42 7.46% 33 10.61% 1.475 (0.914–2.380) 2.550 0.110
AA 3 0.53% 2 0.64% 1.251 (0.208–7.533) 0.060 0.806
C 1078 95.74% 585 94.05% 1.420 (0.914–2.206) 2.460 0.117
A 48 4.26% 37 5.95%
AA + AC vs CC 1.460 (0.917–2.325) 2.560 0.109
AA vs AC + CC 0.828 (0.138–4.980) 0.040 0.836
rs2723175 GG 374 66.43% 217 69.77% Ref
AG 156 27.71% 82 26.37% 0.906 (0.661–1.242) 0.380 0.539
AA 33 5.86% 12 3.86% 0.627 (0.317–1.239) 1.830 0.176
G 904 80.28% 516 82.96% 0.837 (0.648–1.080) 1.880 0.170
A 222 19.72% 106 17.04%
AA + AG vs GG 0.857 (0.636–1.155) 1.020 0.312
AA vs AG + GG 1.551 (0.789–3.049) 1.650 0.199
rs2723186 GG 509 90.41% 273 87.78% Ref
AG 30 5.33% 24 7.72% 1.492 (0.855–2.602) 2.00 0.157
AA 24 4.26% 14 4.50% 1.088 (0.554–2.137) 0.060 0.807
G 1048 93.07% 570 91.64% 1.226 (0.851–1.766) 1.200 0.274
A 78 6.93% 52 8.36%
AA + AG vs GG 1.312 (0.845–2.038) 1.470 0.226
AA vs AG + GG 0.945 (0.481–1.854) 0.030 0.868
rs2723168 AA 23 4.09% 12 3.86% Ref
AG 537 95.38% 297 95.50% 1.060 (0.520–2.161) 0.030 0.872
GG 3 0.53% 2 0.64% 1.278 (0.187–8.720) 0.060 0.802
A 583 51.78% 321 51.61% 1.007 (0.828–1.225) 0.00 0.946
G 543 48.22% 301 48.39%
GG + AG vs AA 1.061 (0.521–2.163) 0.030 0.869
GG vs AG + AA 0.828 (0.138–4.980) 0.040 0.836
rs4364030 CC 268 47.60% 160 51.45% Ref
CG 241 42.81% 116 37.30% 0.806 (0.600–1.084) 2.040 0.153
GG 54 9.59% 35 11.25% 1.086 (0.680–1.734) 0.120 0.731
C 777 69.01% 436 70.10% 0.950 (0.767–1.175) 0.220 0.636
G 349 30.99% 186 29.90%
GG + CG vs CC 0.857 (0.650–1.131) 1.190 0.276
GG vs CG + CC 0.837 (0.534–1.312) 0.610 0.436
rs3811047 GG 160 28.42% 123 39.55% Ref
AG 267 47.42% 151 48.55% 0.736 (0.540–1.001) 3.820 0.051
AA 136 24.16% 101 32.48% 0.966 (0.682–1.369) 0.040 0.846
G 587 52.13% 397 63.83% 0.968 (0.805–1.165) 0.120 0.733
A 539 47.87% 353 56.75%
AA + AG vs GG 0.813 (0.613–1.079) 2.050 0.152
AA vs AG + GG 0.864 (0.641–1.165) 0.920 0.338
rs28947200 CC 499 88.63% 272 87.46% Ref
CT 49 8.70% 31 9.97% 1.161 (0.723–1.863) 0.380 0.537
TT 15 2.66% 8 2.57% 0.978 (0.410–2.337) 0.00 0.961
C 1047 92.98% 575 92.44% 1.083 (0.744–1.576) 0.170 0.676
T 79 7.02% 47 7.56%
TT + CT vs CC 1.118 (0.731–1.709) 0.260 0.606
TT vs CT + CC 1.037 (0.435–2.473) 0.010 0.935
rs4392270 GG 522 92.72% 274 88.10% Ref
AG 29 5.15% 25 8.04% 1.642 (0.943–2.860) 3.130 0.077
AA 12 2.13% 12 3.86% 1.905 (0.845–4.297) 2.490 0.115
G 1073 95.29% 573 92.12% 1.731 (1.159–2.587) 7.330 0.007
A 53 4.71% 49 7.88%
AA + AG vs GG 1.719 (1.077–2.745) 5.250 0.022
AA vs AG + GG 0.543 (0.241–1.223) 2.240 0.135
rs4849133 TT 463 82.24% 243 78.14% Ref
CT 65 11.55% 54 17.36% 1.583 (1.069–2.345) 5.310 0.021
CC 35 6.22% 14 4.50% 0.762 (0.402–1.444) 0.70 0.404
T 991 88.01% 540 86.82% 1.115 (0.831–1.495) 0.530 0.468
C 135 11.99% 82 13.18%
CC + CT vs TT 1.296 (0.918–1.829) 2.170 0.141
CC vs CT + TT 1.406 (0.745–2.656) 1.110 0.291
rs2708973 GG 512 90.94% 275 88.42% Ref
AG 39 6.93% 26 8.36% 1.241 (0.740–2.082) 0.670 0.412
AA 12 2.13% 10 3.22% 1.552 (0.662–3.637) 1.040 0.309
G 1063 94.40% 576 92.60% 1.347 (0.909–1.997) 2.220 0.136
A 63 5.60% 46 7.40%
AA + AG vs GG 1.314 (0.837–2.063) 1.520 0.234
AA vs AG + GG 0.656 (0.280–1.535) 0.960 0.327

Bold indicates significance.