Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 29;8(7):e010114. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010114

Table 2.

End‐Diastolic NRC at Rest and Peak Exercise

HFpEF (n=30 HT (n=17) Healthy (n=17) P Value (Overall) P Values for 2‐Way Comparisons if Overall Significant
HFpEF vs HT HFpEF vs Healthy HT vs Healthy
NRC (dias) rest 1.09 (0.01) 1.10 (0.02) 1.09 (0.02) 0.80
NRC (dias) peak exercise 1.54 (0.07) 1.27 (0.06) 1.14 (0.03) 0.0001 0.006a 0.0001a 0.241
ΔNRC (dias)b 0.45 (0.06) 0.17 (0.05) 0.06 (0.03) 0.0001 0.0014a 0.0001a 0.472

Values are mean (SEM). HFpEF indicates heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HT, hypertensive controls; NRC, normalized radius of curvature; ΔNRC, change in normalized radius of curvature.

a

P (adjusted)≤0.017.

b

The change in end‐diastolic NRC on exercise was significant for HFpEF patients (P<0.001), but not hypertensive (P=0.38) or normotensive controls (P=0.93).