Table 3.
Simple linear regression equations for predicting ECAS-B and ECAS-C performance.
R2 | SEE | C | β(ECAS-A) | X - ^X | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predicting ECAS-B from ECAS-A | |||||
ALS Specific | 0.398 | 5.29 | 34.18 | 0.613 | ±8.70 |
ALS Non-Specific | 0.297 | 2.25 | 15.31 | 0.490 | ±3.70 |
ECAS Total | 0.448 | 6.23 | 41.62 | 0.648 | ±10.24 |
|
R2 |
SEE |
C |
β(ECAS-B) |
X - ^X |
Predicting ECAS-C from ECAS-B | |||||
ALS Specific | 0.700 | 5.30 | 34.18 | 0.938 | ±8.72 |
ALS Non-Specific | 0.597 | 2.00 | 11.60 | 0.628 | ±3.29 |
ECAS Total | 0.741 | 6.12 | 14.78 | 0.872 | ±10.07 |
R2 is the multiple R2. SEE is the residual standard error, C is the intercept, β is the beta coefficient associated with the subscript ECAS, X - ^X is the residual (i.e. the difference between the model predicted score and the observed score). The X - ^X column indicates the number of points difference required between observed and estimated score to determine reliable difference – this is calculated as 1.645*(SEE).