Table 4. Net benefits for the stakeholders involved with the biosecurity interventions in 2016 (€)*1000.
| Biosecurity intervention | ||
|---|---|---|
| Stakeholders | Min | Max |
| Producers | ||
| Farmers | -2,103 | -701 |
| Slaughterhousesa | -439 | -482 |
| +439 | +482 | |
| Consumers | ||
| Intervention costs slaughterhouses | -439 | -482 |
| DALYs averted | 16 | 23 |
| Patient costs | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Productivity losses | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| Government | ||
| Healthcare costs | 3 | 23 |
| Special education costs | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Net benefitsb | -2,525 | -1,136 |
Min: using least economically favorable input parameters, Max: using most economically favorable input parameters,
aIntervention costs occurring in slaughterhouses will be put through to consumer (so at slaughterhouse level it will be zero),
b note: a negative number corresponds with costs, a positive number with savings