Table 3.

Summary of RP2 prediction results from all the four strategies

Methods	Num of features	AUC	DeLong test
Case B (VAE+MLP)	7 (latent_Z)	0.624 (95%CI: 0.577–0.658)	P‐value: $1.33\times {10}^{-7}$
Case C (VAE‐MLP)	2 (latent_Z)	0.781 (95%CI: 0.737–0.808)
Case A (WP+MLP)	29	0.804 (95% CI: 0.761–0.823)	P‐value: $6.42\times {10}^{-4}$
Case D ([latent Z + WP]+MLP)	22+2 (latent_Z)	0.831 (95% CI: 0.805–0.863)