Table 4.
SRPS1 z-scores |
CES-D z-scores |
Hope z-scores |
Any partner |
Older1 partner |
Transactional1 sex |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coefficient (SE) | RR (95% CI) | ||||||
Model 1 | CCT (total effect) | 0.00 | −0.02 | −0.02 | 0.91** | 0.91 | 1.03 |
(0.05) | (0.03) | (0.04) | (0.84 – 0.99) | (0.74 – 1.12) | (0.87 – 1.21) | ||
Model 2 | CCT*Baseline poverty | 0.28*** | −0.14** | 0.14** | 1.03 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
(0.10) | (0.07) | (0.07) | (0.87 – 1.22) | (0.54 – 1.23) | (0.66 – 1.31) | ||
CCT | −0.14* | 0.05 | −0.09* | 0.90* | 1.08 | 1.08 | |
(0.07) | (0.05) | (0.05) | (0.79 – 1.02) | (0.80 – 1.44) | (0.84 – 1.41) | ||
Baseline poverty | −0.22*** | 0.13*** | −0.16*** | 0.99 | 1.05 | 1.23* | |
(0.07) | (0.05) | (0.05) | (0.87 – 1.12) | (0.79 – 1.41) | (0.97 – 1.57) | ||
Observations | 1,884 | 4,867 | 5,031 | 5,031 | 2,189 | 1,956 |
Notes: p<0.1;
p<0.05
p<0.01.
Coefficients estimated using GEE linear models with robust standard errors. Baseline poverty is defined as being in the bottom half of households for total per capita household consumption at baseline. Risk ratios estimates using GEE log-binomial models with robust standard errors. All models adjusted for age.
1Only for young women who had ever had sex.