Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Radiol. 2018 Nov 10;26(9):1137–1145. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.10.010

Table 2:

Average AUC and average standard deviation of the observers’ likelihood estimates with and without CDSS-T for the entire set of treatment pairs, and the subsets of easy (average standard deviation of observers’ ratings less than 25%), and difficult (average standard deviation of observers’ ratings ≥25%) treatment pairs.

CDSS-T Physicians
Without CDSS-T
Physicians
With CDSS-T
Comparison of
(Physicians with vs
without CDSS-T)
AUC Average
AUC
Average standard deviation of observers’ likelihood estimates Average
AUC
Average standard deviation of observers’ likelihood estimates p-value for difference in standard deviation
Entire
Set
0.80 0.74 20.4 0.77 17.9 <0.001*
Easy
Subset
0.88 0.81 14.7 0.84 13.4 0.02*
Difficult
Subset
0.65 0.59 29.1 0.62 24.7 <0.001*
*

Statistically significant at α = 0.05 after Holm-Bonferoni correction