Skip to main content
. 2019 May 3;14:100877. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100877

Table 4.

A summary of the included intervention studies and their characteristics. N = sample size; I = intervention group sample size; C = control group sample size; sig. = significant.

Study ID, country, study design Sample size Focus of intervention Mode and length of intervention Physical activity-specific results
Brazeau 2014
Canada, single arm pre-post
N = 36 Diet and physical activity Group, telephone, website; 13 weeks No change in accelerometer measures; pedometer measures increased by 733 steps/day (95% CI 85, 1391)
Brazeau 2018
Canada, single arm pre-post
N = 118 (59 couples) Diet and physical activity Group, website, texting; 13 weeks Sig. incr. in step counts and moderate-vigorous physical activity in mothers and partners. Partners decreased sitting time sig. and similar trend in mothers.
Cheung 2007
Australia, single arm pre-post
N = 25 Diet, physical activity, breastfeeding, child nutrition Group, telephone, newsletters; 12 months Sig. incr. in walking. No sig. changes in vigorous activity or total leisure time.
Cheung 2011
Australia, RCT
N = 43
I = 96, C = 101
Physical activity Individual, telephone, postcards; 12 months No sig. changes in physical activity.
Ferrara 2011
USA, RCT
N = 197
I = 1097, C = 1193
Diet, physical activity, breastfeeding Individual, telephone; 12 months No sig. changes in physical activity.
Ferrara 2016
USA, RCT
N = 2280 Diet and physical activity Telephone, newsletters, website; 12 months Vigorous physical activity levels sig. higher in intervention group as compared to control group. No sig. differences in moderate intensity activity.
Kim 2012
USA, RCT
N = 49
I = 21, C = 28
Physical activity Website; 13 weeks No sig. changes in physical activity.
Liu 2017
China, RCT
N = 1180
I = 586, C = 594
Diet and physical activity Individual, telephone; 12 months Sig. incr. in physical activity.
McIntyre 2012
Australia, RCT
N = 28
I = 15, C = 13
Physical activity Individual, telephone; 12 weeks No sig. changes in physical activity.
McManus 2015
Canada, RCT
N = 170
I = 89, C = 81
Diet and physical activity Individual, website, group; 12 months No sig. changes in physical activity.
Mukerji 2015
Canada, single arm pre-post
N = 17 Diet and physical activity Individual, telephone; 6 months Sig. incr. in exercise capacity.
Nicholson 2016
USA, single arm pre-post
N = 23 Diet and physical activity Website; 30 weeks No sig. changes in physical activity.
O'Reilly 2016
Australia, RCT
N = 573
I = 284, C = 289
Diet and physical activity Group, individual, telephone; 12 months No sig. changes in physical activity.
Peacock 2015
Australia, RCT
N = 31
I = 16, C = 15
Diet and physical activity Group, website; 4 weeks No sig. changes in physical activity.
Perez-Ferre 2015
Spain, RCT
N = 260
I = 130, C = 130
Diet and physical activity Group, individual; 6 months No sig. changes in physical activity.
Philis-Tsimikas 2012 USA, single arm pre-post N = 84 Diet, physical activity and mental health Group; 8 weeks Sig. incr. in aerobic capacity, flexibility and strength training.
Reinhardt 2012
Australia, RCT
N = 38
I = 18, C = 20
Diet and physical activity Booklet, telephone; 6 months Sig. incr. in leisure time physical activity, but no changes in total activity levels.
Smith 2014
Australia, RCT
N = 59
I = 29, C = 30
Diet and physical activity Individual, telephone, postcards; 6 months No sig. changes in physical activity.