Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 11;9:35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.03.007

Table 1.

Patients and treatment characteristics.

Global series (n = 14) 1.3 mg/m2 dose (n = 7) 1.5 mg/m2 dose (n = 7)
Median age (range) 36 (24–71) 31 (24–71) 53 (28–68)
Sex (M/F) 7 (50%)/7 (50%) 4 (57%)/3 (43%) 3 (43%)/4 (57%)
ECOG PS
 - 0
 - 1

9 (62%)
5 (38%)

5 (71%)
2 (29%)

4 (57%)
3 (43%)
Grade
 - 1
 - 3

11 (79%)
3 (21%)

7 (100%)
0 (0%)

4 (57%)
3 (43%)
Location
 - Thigh
 - Leg
 - Buttock

10 (71%)
3 (21%)
1 (7%)

6 (86%)
0 (0%)
1 (14%)

4 (57%)
3 (43%)
0
Median size mm. (range) 130 (70–200) 130 (30–170) 110 (57–200)
Depth
 - Deep
 - Superficial

14 (100%)
0

7 (100%)
0

7 (100%)
0
Radiotherapy dose
 - 45 G
 - 50 Gy

13 (93%)
1 (7%)

7 (100%)
0

6 (86%)
1 (14%)
Surgery
 - Yes
 - No (n = 2)

12 (86%)
2 (14%)a

6 (86%)
1 (14%)

6 (86%)
1 (14%)
Surgical margin
 - Free
 - Positive

7 (58%)
5 (42%)

4 (67%)
2 (33%)

3 (50%)
3 (50%)
CHOP rearrangement
 - Positive
 - Not available

12 (86%)
2 (14%)b

6 (86%)
1 (14%)

6 (86%)
1 (14%)
a

2 patients did not undergo surgery, one because developed metastatic disease during neoadjuvant therapy and one because developed a sepsis due to central venous catheter infection and was treated by definitive RT.

b

2 not evaluable for limited material on the biopsy and lack of residual tumor on the surgical specimen.