Skip to main content
. 2018 May 10;28(2):189–201. doi: 10.1007/s00787-018-1161-9

Table 4.

Secondary outcome measures at baseline, week 24/posttreatment and 3-months follow-up

Measure (rater) Mean (95% CI)a Group difference in change score P Effect size (95% CI)b
KONTAKT + standard care (n = 23) Standard care (n = 27)
ABAS-II (parent)
 Baseline 388.0 (361.3–414.8) 376.0 (351.3–400.7)
 Posttreatment 411.6 (383.6–439.6) 386.5 (361.5–411.5) 13.1 (− 8.5 to 34.7) 0.25 0.19 (− 0.37 to 0.75)
 Follow-up 427.2 (399.0–455.5) 399.1 (373.9–424.3) 16.1 (− 6 to 38.3) 0.16 0.24 (− 0.32 to 0.80)
ABAS-II (teacher)
 Baseline 361.1 (330.9–391.3) 339.0 (308.0–370.0)
 Posttreatment 386.2 (350.6–421.8) 344.2 (312.2–376.2) 19.9 (− 13.9 to 53.6) 0.27 0.26 (− 0.30 to 0.82)
 Follow-up 379.3 (345.7–413.0) 349.6 (316.7–382.5) 7.6 (− 26.1 to 41.0) 0.67 0.10 (− 0.46 to 0.66)
DD-CGAS (trainer)
 Baseline 56.0 (52.9–59.1) 56.4 (53.5–59.2)
 Posttreatment 60.6 (57–64.2) 55.7 (52.8–58.7) 5.2 (0.2–10.2) 0.046 0.83 (0.25–1.41)
 Follow-up 60 (56.6–63.4) 58.6 (55.7–61.4) 1.8 (− 3.1 to 6.6) 0.48 0.29 (− 0.27 to 0.85)
CGI-S (trainer)
 Baseline 4.3 (4.0–4.7) 4.5 (4.2–4.8)
 Posttreatment 4.1 (3.7–4.4) 4.4 (4.1–4.7) − 0.2 (− 0.7 to 0.4) 0.56 0.31(− 0.25 to 0.87)
 Follow-up 3.9 (3.6–4.3) 4.0 (3.7–4.3) 0.1 (− 0.5 to 0.6) 0.83 − 0.16 (− 0.72 to 0.40)
CiS (child self-report)
 Baseline 2.4 (2.2–2.6) 2.3 (2.2–2.5)
 Posttreatment 2.4 (2.2–2.7) 2.3 (2.1–2.5) 0.1 (− 0.1 to 0.3) 0.45 − 0.20 (− 0.76 to 0.36)
 Follow-up 2.4 (2.1–2.6) 2.3 (2.1–2.5) 0.0 (− 0.2 to 0.2) 0.90 0.00 (− 0.56 to 0.56)
PSS (parental self-report)
 Baseline 26.3 (22.9–29.6) 25.9 (22.8–29.0)
 Posttreatment  20.1 (16.3–24) 23.4 (20.2–26.6) − 3.6 (− 8.3 to 1.0) 0.14 0.46 (− 0.10 to 1.02)
 Follow-up 19.1 (15.3–23) 21.6 (18.4–24.9) − 2.8 (− 7.5 to 1.8) 0.24 0.36 (− 0.20 to 0.92)

ABAS-II adaptive behavior assessment system II, CGI-S OSU Autism Clinical Global Impression—Severity, CiS children in stress, DD-CGAS, developmental disabilities modification of the Children’s Global Assessment Scale, PSS Perceived Stress Scale

a Data are presented as raw mean scores at baseline and least squares mean values for week 12/posttreatment and 3 months follow-up with 95% CIs for each assessment point

b Effect sizes were calculated by taking the difference in the least squares means at 24 week/posttreatment and follow-up dividing by the pooled standard deviation at baseline; positive effect sizes favor KONTAKT