Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 14;29(6):3006–3016. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5950-9

Table 4.

Correlation between cardiac magnetic resonance derived diffuse myocardial fibrosis markers and myocardial function

Variable mFI
correlation coefficient
p value T1 ρ
correlation coefficient
p value ECV
correlation coefficient
p value
GSrL (1/s) − 0.421 0.029 − 0.377 0.053 − 0.607 0.001
GSL (%) 0.243 0.222 0.297 0.132 0.434 0.024
E (cm/s) 0.167 0.404 − 0.111 0.580 0.060 0.768
E/A − 0.213 0.285 − 0.207 0.300 − 0.099 0.623
E’ (cm/s) − 0.465 0.014 − 0.549 0.003 − 0.715 0.000
E’/A’ − 0.470 0.013 − 0.570 0.002 − 0.660 0.000
E/E’ 0.352 0.072 0.303 0.125 0.528 0.005

p value was the results of Pearson method (for normally distributed date) or Spearman method (for non-normally distributed date). A, transmitral late diastolic filling velocity; A’, late diastolic mitral annulus velocity; E, transmitral early diastolic filling velocity; E’, early diastolic mitral annulus velocity; GSL, global peak systolic longitudinal strain; GSrL, global peak diastolic longitudinal strain rate