Skip to main content
. 2019 May 7;14:805–816. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S204121

Table 2.

The effect of TFI and socioclinical factors on perceived QoL

Variable Multivariate analysis* Univariate analysis
Correlation coefficient p**
Regression parameter 95% CI p Mean (SD) Median (quartiles)
Physical components −0.172 −0.277 −0.067 0.002 −0.452 <0.001
Psychological components −0.089 −0.262 0.085 0.313 −0.025 0.806
Social components −0.071 −0.266 0.124 0.47 −0.17 0.091
Age −0.008 −0.025 0.01 0.381 −0.191 0.058
Number of hospitalisztions due to CVD in the last year −0.063 −0.186 0.059 0.308 −0.227 0.023
Illness duration 0.002 −0.017 0.021 0.831 −0.161 0.11
TFI No frailty Ref. item 4.1 (0.55) 4 (4–4) 0.003
Frailty 0.345 −0.141 0.831 0.162 3.58 (0.71) 4 (3–4)
Gender Male Ref. item 3.82 (0.72) 4 (3–4) 0.008
Female −0.182 −0.47 0.106 0.212 3.46 (0.64) 3 (3–4)

Notes: *Adjusted to marital status, education, professional status, place of residence, comorbidities, medication, smoking. **Mann-Whitney test/Kruskal-Wallis test.

Abbreviations: TFI, Tilburg Frailty Indicator; SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval; ref., referral; QoL, quality of life.