Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr;9(4):552–564. doi: 10.21037/qims.2019.03.13

Table 4. Comparison of measured VCE, TID, radiation dose, quantitative and qualitative image analysis.

Parameters Group 2 Reference Group P value
Measured VCE (HU) 393.5±33.0 465.0±50.8 0.0001*
TID (g) 19.5±2.7 28.7±1.4 0.0001*
HE (mSv) 4.8±0.8 7.8±2.0 0.0001*
Quantitative image quality analysis
   Image noise (HU) 26.0±4.5 24.6±3.3 0.070
   SNR
      RCA 15.1±2.9 19.1±4.0 0.0001*
      LM 15.9±3.4 19.0±3.3 0.0001*
      LAD 15.9±3.0 18.1±3.5 0.001*
      LCx 15.6±2.9 18.2±3.8 0.001*
   CNR
      RCA 12.1±2.6 16.4±3.7 0.0001*
      LM 12.9±2.6 16.4±3.0 0.0001*
      LAD 12.7±2.4 15.4±3.2 0.0001*
      LCx 12.6±2.6 15.6±3.5 0.0001*
   FOM (mSv–1)
      RCA 33.1±17.9 38.8±19.8 0.201
      LM 37.4±16.9 36.9±14.9 0.888
      LAD 36.0±15.9 33.2±14.9 0.485
      LCx 35.8±15.6 33.9±15.6 0.586
Qualitative image quality analysis
   VCE
      RCA 4.8 (4.0–5.0) 4.9 (4.5–5.0) 0.130
      LM 4.7 (3.5–5.0) 4.8 (4.0–5.0) 0.186
      LAD 4.7 (4.0–5.0) 4.9 (4.0–5.0) 0.169
      LCx 4.8 (3.5–5.0) 4.9 (3.5–5.0) 0.191

*, P<0.05. CNR, contrast-to-noise ratio; FOM, figure of merit; HE, effective dose; SNR, signal-to-noise ratio; TID, total iodine dose; VCE, vessel contrast enhancement; LAD, left anterior descending; LCx, left circumflex; LM, left main; RCA, right coronary artery.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure